49 karma · joined July 3, 2012
Technically, it's not free. Nothing is rarely free in this world. Our (people working in the US) tax dollars go to NASA and they use this money to build and support this new streaming system. Is this going to worth the effort and money? We will see.
I would love to understand the decision behind this when they have been "fine" with Twitch and YouTube all these years.
Please re-read the article and my comment. Neither said anything about who named these plans. The fact is that the name itself is misleading people.
Also, the article gives a few examples how the private insurance companies _tricks_ people to think that MA plans are always better. I worked at one of these big insurance companies, and we implemented products and worded things in a way to ensure that we increase the growth of the Medicare Advantage plans. At the time, I genuinely thought the Medicare Advantage plans were always better but that is not the case. It's actually very difficult to choose which one would be better and the fact that it's really hard to change exacerbates the situation.
You don't have to agree with me. You are one of better people who can understand these plans better. Consider people with less education on this subject and have some empathy. You might think this differently.
Check http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/lifecycle for the current list of Windows.
When I talked about the retention rate, I was focused on employees who've been with the company for 3 yrs or less. In tech industry, especially in software engineering field, people switch jobs fast. really fast. All my colleagues switch jobs every 2-3 years. For companies like Microsoft, Google, and Apple, this is not good. They now have to spend money to find potential candidates, spend more money to interview those potential candidates, make full-time employees to interview potential candidates (5-8 interviewer per candidate), etc.
I personally believe having a robust framework that constantly gets updates and new features is a good sign for the development community. Just comparing the changes happened in .NET to Java frameworks, I would to know how moving away from the .NET is a better choice. Is there any other robust framework that you are considering? I don't know any other frameworks that are robust enough. Python and PHP certainly don't have the any comparable size of "ecosystem" when compared to .NET. I use other frameworks when I have to, and this usually happens when I'm developing mobile applications (Object-C for iOS and Java for Android). So far, with changes in Azure, I'm pretty happy with what .NET has done and where .NET is going.
Async/await is something I don't have too much experience, though. So far, I don't think the feature wouldn't be too useful for a complex system and expect the community to stick with how asynchronous programming has been done in the past (e.g. Begin/End methods and IAsyncResults) for such system. However, I think it's a really simple syntactic sugar that developers can take an advantage when they are developing rather relatively small applications, such as windows 8 apps.