windows_tips

A patent on fast Fourier transform would essentially do nothing, as no one appears to be selling the algorithm outright.

Does Zuckerberg defend their supposed right to prevent others from doing the things in their patent for commercial purposes?

>One of them describes using forward-facing cameras to analyze your expressions and detect whether you’re bored or surprised by what you see on your feed.

They patented a feature of their own platform?

Except I've heard near copies of the exact line inside major corporations.

Vesting isn't perfect though. It treats all contributions the same and only really looks at the time it took to do some work.

The ideal situation seems to be that anyone doing work immediately vests ownership upon performing the work.

>I have seen multiple companies explode, friendships deteriorate, businesses die a slow death, or waste hundreds of hours (and dollars) working through the emotional debt built up from not splitting equity evenly.

Do you think it is a coincidence that the leader of Alphabet resigned not long after failing to answer one of Google's own interview questions about how he might split up pirate booty?

https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/285789

Seems like dialectical arguments are highly reliant on strawmen, pretty much by definition.

Should it be?

comply with and enforce

If you think that is an appropriate limit.

The solution is to make checking headlines part of your work.

There is no tax in this situation.

What's the value of a 'future earning'?

Do you think may candidates would accept such a blatant bait and switch?

>dropped the offer salary for a new candidate

>Although the court left open the possibility that other arguments could be pressed against the South Dakota law, Kennedy’s majority opinion strongly suggested the measure was constitutional, in part because it has the $100,000 threshold and...

Anyone know where the Constitution talks about this $100,000 threshold?

>doesn’t try to impose retroactive taxation.

Similar to how it presumably not limiting what arms can be sold makes it 'constitutional'.

Hmm, always 30% or sometimes 8%?

Is this the HN position, AT&T: charge us for your content ?

>"Under color of law" means that you're a law enforcement official.

No.

Collection of taxes is done to enforce law, unless the state is compelling people with something else?

Collecting 'tax' on an untaxed item could be considered acting falsely under color of law.

Galileo was making lenses hundreds of years before the time we are talking about. Also, eye and magnifying glasses existed then.

Why does Tether need the money? The tokens aren't redeemable for USD, are they?

You don't need solar cells to heat water to boiling, just glass or a metal like aluminum or silver.

With glass you can build a lens to concentrate light. With a metal you can build a concentrating mirror.

There was already heavy investment in steam technology. Using the sun the boil water instead of coal or wood is much less resource intensive and completely eliminates external supply chains.

Integrated timer with small nuclear power source.

>How could the industrial boom in China or the USA in the late 1800s and early 1900s have happened without emvironmental destruction? How can growth happen in China now without it?

Possibly if they had used solar-thermal power generation and focused on battery tech instead of exploiting petroleum so heavily.

I think the solution is pretty simple: encrypt with a one-time pad and then store the pad in a box that will burn that pad at your desired time; make sure no one can ever see the pad and your secret will be pretty safe.

> $1 billion per line

UK government is unlawful.

http://www.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/acts-ordinances-i...

There was a city library near me. There may be one near you too.

How old are you?