2,217 karma · joined January 17, 2018
I interned in high school at Brookhaven National Lab working on a team that analyzed STAR (Solenoidal Tracker at RHIC) data from RHIC (Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider). I didn't contribute all that much as a high school intern but the program director said at the end that he liked the high school program because he wanted to help funnel and bring people back to help build up the labs.
My experience was that everyone there was extremely smart, but all post-doc and top scientists in their field (the team I worked on was looking for Anti-Alpha particles from gold-gold particle collisions that also helped create Quark Gluon Plasma). So I'm not sure their relative need for regular software engineers.
In terms of bureaucracy, you're still working for the government. The scientists all complained about the layers of government bureaucracy but were mostly okay with it. High-tier science moves at a pretty slow pace; coming from a tech background you might not be used to the slow pace around the actual physical construction of some of these devices, let alone the fund-seeking, approvals, testing, runs, and data collection. and 33-50% is a hopeful estimate. Let's say one is a 500k a year senior/staff SWE at FAANG. at a similar level of experience, one's pay would be very lucky to break 150k.
So fascinating science, layers of bureaucracy, slow moving stuff, PhD's in their fields, and reduced pay. Again I was only a high school intern, but I spoke with the scientists about their experiences so take my recollection with massive salt. I walked away from the summer fascinated by the work and I had a love of physics at the time; but I also left (this was 2010 IIRC?) watching the world of tech explode at a massive pace and thought that I didn't like physics enough ( I had spent my junior/senior year of high school doing a capstone project on theoretical physics and having taken a lot of physics classes). When I went to college the next year, I tried a few engineering courses, and switched to CS. I'm glad I made the switch.
If CEO's of today on average leading companies that are orders of magnitude larger than in the 70's (CEO has 100-1000 people in the company in 70's vs 1,000-100,000 today), then the jump in pay isn't surprising. If the CEO is driving the direction of a company and those decisions affect orders of magnitude more workers and orders of magnitude more revenue, then it follows that they can get a higher salary. They might not be any better, but the stakes of their decisions are bigger.
Sure, there's debate about pro's and con's of corporate consolidation and market failures surrounding monopolies and oligopolies. But, with the increase in connectivity between regions via telecom, internet, mobile, etc; wouldn't there be an expectation of increased economies of scale from more frictionless communication?
If we note increased economies from scale for companies, it would naturally follow a CEO's wage would rise given the weight CEO's decisions when compared to results of company and number of workers affected. The CEO of walmart vs the CEO of 5 general stores would obviously change.
All I'm noting is that perhaps this is downstream of consolidation and that's the pertinent discussion, not deciding on socialism/revolution.
https://www.rd.com/list/13-things-lottery-winners/#:~:text=W....
Edit: bc I forgot, we can't even replicate human breast milk fully well!
Pardon my silly US lack of knowledge
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%E2%80%93Russia_relations
How does this purchase not ending hurting them in the sense that, if they buy Russian oil in this crisis in defiance of the West's objections; wouldn't that come back to bite them potentially if China aggressed on India in a potentially parallel border dispute?
I am very excited about space and the future, I just think that in the years since Apollo the story has been emblematic of wastefulness, contractor level benign corruption (cost plus contracting) more than it has been inspiring with the stories you mentioned. just my opinion.
1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_of_NASA
2 https://techcrunch.com/2020/03/11/nasas-sls-moon-rocket-is-2...
People may disagree, but I think that the distinction and separation of state/local/federal law is great. one size often does not fit all and having different methods of laws experimented with and seen "in production" is useful despite downsides and the inherent difficulty in having 50 states have a different policy on something.
Yes. We have. (Advil, Indocin, Sulfasalazine, Meloxicam, Diclofenac Sodium, Remicade, Humira, Enbrel, Curcumin, Vitamin D and also A-Z, Gluten Free, Vegan, Paleo, Whole30, Mediterranean, Yoga, Pilates, Acupuncture, Stem cell injections, Steroid injections, Physical Therapy, Glucosamine, Glutamine, BCAA's, Probiotics, Probiotic foods, electro stim therapy, heat, cold, stretching, Meditation, CBD, CBT, starch free, and probably other stuff I'm forgetting)
[1]: https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikaandersen/2012/03/23/true-f...