Two can play at this game. I predict that at some future date the stock market will be higher than it is today.
1,280 karma · joined December 15, 2014
Two can play at this game. I predict that at some future date the stock market will be higher than it is today.
In practice you just don't see examples of productive companies driven into insolvency by short sellers.
Yes.
> and cause all manner of discomfort, public reckoning,
No.
The etiquette is to let people speak their piece while the board looks concerned, but as far as I know there have never been any actual consequences from this.
https://randomcriticalanalysis.com/why-conventional-wisdom-o...
He agrees with the linked article that lifestyle factors are what drives the worse health outcomes in the US relative to other wealthy countries. They're not primarily driven by differences in access to or effectiveness in health care. He also makes the case for a few other very unintuitive points:
* Health care spending is a direct function of national wealth. If a country gets richer it spends more on health care, and every country at every time in modern history spends about the same amount on health care as a function of its wealth.
* The US looks like an outlier in health care spending because GDP is not a perfect measure of wealth. Actual Individual Consumption is a less well-known but much more relevant measure of national wealth. AIC shows the US is more of an outlier in wealth, which makes its high health care spending less remarkable.
* There's no magic bullet. Single payer nations pay less than the US mostly because they are less wealthy and health care spending is a function of wealth. Other countries have better health outcomes mostly because of demographics and culture, which can't be fixed by the health care system. And even though finding obvious waste and inefficiency in the US health care system is easy, at a macro level it doesn't look like the US is remarkably less efficient than other rich countries, and most spending goes towards things that patients want.
No, like he said the most valuable data has a signal that is independent from other data sets, which generally means something proprietary, and almost always without a long history. Having a cleaned archive of standard data with a long history is valuable but already pretty well served. It would be hard to compete with CRSP.
> "To separate [black children] from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely to ever be undone."
> The Court supported this conclusion with citations—in a footnote, not the main text of the opinion—to a number of psychological studies that purported to show that segregating black children made them feel inferior and interfered with their learning.
I think that in general if a bunch of people say they're experiencing a problem than that's enough evidence that there is really a problem. But the Civil Rights movement did have objective factual support from the beginning.
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:V_siZl...
Therefore "mm" is the most unambiguous way to denote millions, and is used in accounting.
Obviously you don't want to penalize the candidate for not reading your mind and guessing the definition you had in mind. But I do think it's fair to give extra credit to candidates who notice the ambiguity and ask for clarification. Done well, an ambiguous question can be an opportunity for a candidate to demonstrate a strength, rather than a trick to unfairly penalize someone.
No. This has been tried a lot and has mostly failed. The notation can be a barrier but it isn't the hardest part.
We would expect that an aspiring architect needs to learn a little bit of notation, and a lot about the tradeoffs and constraints of making a building. We should expect that programmers learn a little bit of notation, and a lot about the tradeoffs and constraints of making software.
Knowing your tools well is important, but not sufficient. Focusing on "programming languages" makes people think that the important part is the notation. It is not.
This article explains it better than I could:
http://blog.gtorangebuilder.com/2014/03/gto-poker-outside-of...