Ha! It went straight over my head.
23 karma · joined April 11, 2018
Look, I gotta say, I'm pretty disappointed with the ridiculous level of salesmanship that authors now feel is necessary to get a paper into NIPS. I can only hope the reviewers might ask the researchers to tone back the crazy hype pitch, but I know better than to expect that.
Presenting things that were previously unheard of... well, that would be what scientific papers are for, aren't they?
"could help judge their intentions". Come on now. Today's "AI systems" don't "intend".
"Artificial intelligence is being used to predict gambler behaviour" --> "computers are being used to predict gambler behaviour"
I think it's a lot more reflective of what's actually going on and removes a lot of the clickbaity hype...