For example i expect that searching "a snarky blog post" or "uplifting people"... wouldn't work that great
259 karma · joined March 4, 2019
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/yonz; my proof: https://keybase.io/yonz/sigs/Nz2P_8G1t8p_n8V3eTNFn6jtO3jzGLBR0UDKjQMgFUU ]
For example i expect that searching "a snarky blog post" or "uplifting people"... wouldn't work that great
But I should clarify, did we get enough of a comprehension boost from transformer based Pretrained LLMs to successfully interpret query intent and find related items?
Its a legitimate expectation and potentially the norm to expect that I can ssh to my desktop with IPv6 w/o configuring my router.
The pitfall comes as a side effect of NAT inadvertently making port access rare.
I am looking for data, inbound blocked ipv6 seems unlikely but I only have anecdotal evidence.
NAT was an added layer on top of firewall rules because inbound ports had to be mapped to a particular host and port since the router would not know which host to send to. This created a default opt out experience because for a port on your machine to get accessed, a packet must pass inbound rules and match a port map table entry.
I had a nighthawk, I ended up setting up the ipv6 rules.
The TLDR on the debate so far is if router shipped over the last 20 years have both drop IPV4 and drop IPV6 incoming.
In my opinion, NAT was an added layer on top of firewall rules because inbound ports had to be mapped to a particular host and port since the router would not know which host to send to. This created a default opt out experience because for a port on your machine to get accessed, a packet must pass inbound rules and match a port map table entry.
Easy to test, can someone on a cable box try to reach an open port on their host on IPV6 vs IPV4. My belief is that a majority of setups (maybe not HN hackers) will able to hit a host's open port on v6 and fail on v4.
NAT is definitely an added layer though.
However, if this guidance is trying to influence government office routers and internet gateways... It's a different story.
A transition from IPV4 to IPV6 creates a new per device tracking capability that leaks internal network structure. This in my opinion is worse than internal domains getting certs from Let's Encrypt https://crt.sh/?q=twitter.com cr: https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2022/01/should-you-use-lets-encrypt...
The dual stack, DHCP and SLAAC can go a long way in adding some anonymity.
I was shocked to see that as soon as your ISP switched to IPV6, your host is now directly addressed. As a by product of skipping NAT you are now relying on every machine having proper firewall settings. [UPDATE: or the router drops incoming IPV6 connections w/ it's firewall]
Just think about how many windows machines out there have Remote desktop enabled but were only safe because they were not publicly accessible or the hospital machines that are still running windows XP. God help us.
What was your stack for processing all RSS pages on the internet ?
Take a look at this for example https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/49683-l...
Looking for something that is still alive in 2023
Looking for something that is still alive in 2023
I appreciated the post.
I for one appreciated reading this post and as you can see below there are a lot of well off people who have had similar experiences.
I did rebuild my index, I have a 1TB SSD drive and even excluded external drives.
Yeah, I used to love being able to open apps with CMD+space <app name> enter. Now it doesn't work. And yes, I have apps enabled in spotlight.
1. Getting un-banished from Google ads after a failed credit card charge. No one will tell you why, appeal form doesn't tell you why and eventually I figured out a there had been a failed credit card charge 2 years ago.
2. Recovering a Facebook account with an email-password reset. The profile was frozen after it was hacked and all of a sudden a 5 year old phone number is required to unlock the profile after the password reset. --> Help page to submit a petition still tries to send you to login flow.
How can there be no way to talk to someone?!?
The announcement video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WELL8vFkl3Q&t=1s
Make sure to add babel-plugin-module-resolver and the following aliases in babel.conig.js
_>
'crypto': 'react-native-quick-crypto',
'stream': 'stream-browserify',
'buffer': '@craftzdog/react-native-buffer'
1) Refresher: RNNs, deep net classifier
2) LSTMS
3) Self Attention anything
Any other suggestions for getting back in the loop?