5,195 karma · joined July 4, 2013
Groups face tipping points and runaway effects, especially when agency, or perception of agency, is stripped. Reddit imposed moderators will in many cases lack sufficient objective knowledge to operate niches and pander to remaining niche subject experts with varying results, while in all cases seek to impose an objective, uniform with permissible variation, normative imagination of Redditness, one they themselves lack the agency, sufficient potential to constantly generate chaos, to change.
The only value in Reddit now is a rundown of selling to the community, I pull 4 years from a magical had, selling the communities, then strip asset the intellectual property they claim. Any investor would be mad to think of Reddit as anything but a distressed asset investment.
Otherwise it's unwanted, intrusive, selfish, invasion of my inbox pushing content rather than allowing orderly pull.
It then morphs into a dancing dashboard mannequin, a personal avatar, spouting nonsense, getting on your nerves, while its technoneurons spread, root-like, tapped into you. As you exit the car going into the supermarket, the supermarket is now a construct of the avatar not the bricks and mortar building it was when you were growing up. It exists for the avatar to make your life better, not for you, it robs you of choice and agency it does not agree with.
You go into a small cafe for some splice. It has a touchscreen display to order from, you must pay with a card or ApplePay.
[1] goaccess for example https://goaccess.io/
Could another way of putting that be, it performed a guess based on a heuristic?
And Web 2.0 defined by remixing, RSS, Torrents in the mainstream, Twitter, Flickr, Youtube and many more less acquired today?
I struggle to put the silod and gated repositories of members', and of non-members, knowledge and social interaction in the 'Web 2.0' bucket.
[Edit: The term webX.Y might not even apply much anymore. Quite a lot of the world is app-first where websites are an anachronism, an out-dated concept where a web browser may not be knowingly opened for a month, if ever. For many, the web is dead or not even known; today, for plural manys, it's all AppLand.]
Just as there is no simultaneous conversation about, say, walnuts in offline life, so there are multiple communities that discuss walnuts on boards with all the predicates and social constructs those communities have, from focuses towards, say, farming to environment to cooking, objective focuses, or social focuses in belief, location, language, of community. And no one's prevented from starting their own walnut focused board or even community.
That Lemmys are choosing to not try to be super catch-alls from the start I see as healthy for communities.
For search/discoverability, multiple boards each dedicated to walnuts may not aid discovery, especially in tails where signal is strong, perhaps oldskool directories/newskool directory of search/filtering could start to come in useful.
I noted several in the recent Gandi thread https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36321783 I was noting principally European-based registrars:
inwx.de (DE)
BookMyName.com (FR - LOL modern interface, but part of Scaleway)
netim.com (FR)
freethought.uk (UK)
https://www.nic.ch/registrars (CH, a list of Swiss registrars)
I draw a line at four spaces after commas.
And appreciate that the word "testing" was used seven times in the short post.
Universal local government services app?
I can't see the relationship between Apollo and Reddit as singularly one sided.
Source?
Because this seems to be banded around in comments without anyone sourcing.
I dropped this actual source [1] in another comment, that measures 13% of unsheltered homeless as coming from out of state for LA.
[1] https://www.politifact.com/article/2018/jun/28/dispelling-my...
Source: https://www.politifact.com/article/2018/jun/28/dispelling-my...
Everyone knows, in the lyrics of Leonard Cohen -
Everybody knows the good guys lost
Everybody knows the fight was fixed
The poor stay poor, the rich get rich
That's how it goes Everybody knows
Apple licensed strap for my watch.
Next... Nike licensed shoelaces for my shoes?
A client or service will inevitably be compromised. And with it, the private keys of some, or assumed all, using it, whether stored by the service or logged on entry by a compromised system.
Private keys should be chained, master->subkey, with subkey the public key of the service __or a solution like that or that ends in the same result. When (not if) a service or key is compromised, the key can be blacklisted and/or any key co-signed by a compromised service blacklisted.
I'm confused by the oversight. It's also been raised here https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nostr/issues/97
Until then, I'll have to keep my updates of what I had for breakfast to myself.
If not, the cost would need to be accommodated where the interest's been lost. I don't see a net cost reduction.
Perhaps there's a welfare effect, I don't know; living where cards, phones (QR code or NFC) or bank card (NFC) are all accepted and have been for several years, most passengers still opt for transport card but a non small amount prefer phone but that's my completely localised anecdote.
Would costs be increased through transaction or implementation fees for capital not yet depreciated? Implementation doesn't need to mean new hardware either, it includes tooling, software, but goes beyond to different workflows needing testing from fumbling for phones vs fumbling for cards to customer support - were the results from the trial run you mentioned published? Is there any compelling urgency?
Did it survive? Did it feed on people? Was it captured for nefarious purposes, and are there still more out there?