I was always under the impression that the Sounder (our commuter heavy rail line) used tracks shared with commercial traffic (BNSF, etc.) and thus couldn't be fully developed into a city-wide system...
I was always under the impression that the Sounder (our commuter heavy rail line) used tracks shared with commercial traffic (BNSF, etc.) and thus couldn't be fully developed into a city-wide system...
Seattle Transit just announced a $50 billion plan to blast new right-of-way, never mind the trackage could be doubled by re-using that right-of-way for a few million.
You can still see the tracks on Google Maps:
https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6753261,-122.1882192,16z
although it has been renamed "Cross Kirkland Corridor" in their attempt to hide what it is. Sound Transit prefers a plan that costs one thousand times as much, still won't serve the eastside, and will not be in service until half the existing taxpayers are long dead.
http://seattletransitblog.com/2016/03/12/kirkland-st-struggl...
I'd build the system to the border of Kirkland, and wait for the Kirkland residents to get fed up with rotting on 405.