I appreciate your position, but we simply disagree on this point. If you're interested, I'd recommend re-reading PG's "Submarine" essay. One can smell the sickly-sweet odor of PR on this headline, before even clicking through to TFA, at which point one can barely smell anything else.

After reading TFA, we may conclude that this company is developing a telemedicine product, and that they had some sort of arrangement with a nursing home on Long Island. Concluding anything else, positive or negative, based on obvious self-reportage is not "faith", it's credulousness. It would even be a mistake to fault this company for using obvious PR; every successful firm does the same.