Hacker News Reader

> More intellectually dishonest thing is to not recognize that both of them belong to an evil class of billionaires.

But this article isn't about the evil class of billionaires and who belongs to that class is it? So, it's whataboutism: 'what about mark zuckerberg?'.

View on HN

>But this article isn't about the evil class of billionaires and who belongs to that class is it

Only if we restrict our thinking into how the article frames the world. Which is a sad way of going about reading things...

Nobodies thinking should be restricted by the framing of an article.

I'm just agreeing that it's blatent whataboutism and kind of off topic to bring up something unrelated. I actually do think Mark is likely more dangerous.

> The very essence of "whataboutism" is to deflect criticism by directing it at an unrelated party.

Kinda funny, that's all i got from this article.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com