Interesting assumption from skimming the pdf. Happy to hear your true thoughts once you actually read and fully understand it.
I'm not sure why you are promoting it if you can't explain it yourself.
Here, for comparison, is what appears to me to be a normal scientific paper that mentions spinors:
Supersymmetry, supergravity theories and the dual spinor model F Gliozzi, J Scherk, D Olive - Nuclear Physics B, 1977
http://cds.cern.ch/record/203097/files/CM-P00061869.pdf
Note that it does not end with "THE END" and it does cite other scientific works.