> Plus the UI in Lotus was only slightly less convoluted than Emacs.
Not really. This is from 1992, by then 1-2-3 was in its second version for Windows.
Not really. This is from 1992, by then 1-2-3 was in its second version for Windows.
[1] Windows 3.0 came out in mid-1990 and 1-2-3 for Windows came out at the end of 1991. The options to run 1-2-3 for DOS under Windows until then were comically non-viable. When 1-2-3 for Windows came out, it was practically unusable for those who waited and no longer mattered for those who had already switched away.