Comparing human hallucinations with model “hallucinations” does not make sense to me.
Model hallucinations seems to me like a fancy way to call the model results that make no sense (ie blatant errors). Plus it makes the model more humanoid.
Model hallucinations seems to me like a fancy way to call the model results that make no sense (ie blatant errors). Plus it makes the model more humanoid.
Humans are certainly better but we don't have an absolute sense of what we do or don't know either.
The problem is we are so used to yielding to confidence we don't apply the necessary checks even when we know it is projected by machine.