Also, given the quality of the article in proportion to the speed at which this article was upvoted, I'm not totally sure it wasn't manipulated in some fashion. Decent advice but not worthy of being #1.
The net effect is the same but the motive is more noble. You could call it "home court advantage."
It's hard to be too upset by this. If I see a friend's startup on HN, I'm much more likely to upvote.