His case his "efficient"? What about this one:

"People shouldn't be allowed to bicycle for fun. Only utilitarian bicycles should be allowed. For there's too much energy spent manufacturing mountain bikes, tires, converting ski station into bike parks for the summer. That energy and money should instead be directed towards creating more RAM factories and more datacenters for the AI companies".

Where does such an "efficient" argument ends?

P.S: as a bonus question: does anyone know how to differentiate a paid shill from a sycophant?