if it must be in JS to satisfy the entire sentence, vtop, any node.js application, etc
> The tagline is direct and obvious. What part of running both client-side and server-side don't you understand?
going by the examples I gave, the fact that it doesn't clear up any ambiguity one might have over that tag line
my first reading, it seemed like it was talking about any program, written in JS, that could be run on either server or client, which is obviously meaningless. so I decided to look further, something the site itself didn't clear up
it doesn't mention implementation approaches, effects it would have, (well, it mentions the effects (all 2 of them), giving no actual reason for any of it)
what it could of said, "The same application runs on both server and client, along-side one another. By sending pre-rendered HTML, it greatly speeds up initial page load and allows for more accessibility"
like, that takes no effort, and that no-effort wasn't made in the creation of this site
at this point I'm literally re-typing my previous comment so there isn't much point in continuing.
- - -
I have zero problem with the approach itself, sending HTML is great, per-rendering is great. I have a problem with the site. its only as good as a list of libraries, nothing more