There's no specific reason this shouldn't be possible, but it's simply not implemented in anything I know of.
1,248 karma · joined October 17, 2014
There's no specific reason this shouldn't be possible, but it's simply not implemented in anything I know of.
This name is kind of ridiculous and cumbersome, and is in fact designed to be a name you recognize but don't remember.
Unprofessional? Maybe. But the point of what I do on this account is to participate in these communities. Not to make real contributions or serious projects. Not to make things I would show off in a portfolio or something, and not to collaborate with my real life friends.
I'm wary of using the same name for every community. I have different names for different communities, and this helps me keep my "automated-collection digital footprint" pretty low for each name.
Stereotyping a dev community to use pseudonyms is not a bad thing at all. Sure, it's not strictly in our career interests, but it's good for peace of mind. I have some embarrassing comments on here from a year or two ago. That's ok. I was in high school then. I don't have to worry about it being associated with my real name by an employer -- if the employer puts in the effort to find data that connects my two names, then they've put in far too much effort and it seems they're likely to hire me anyway.
There's something to be said for altruistic contributions that don't necessarily keep your own career interests in mind.
I too am interested in seeing what the non-dev audience has to say. I think they may have the same privacy concerns.
var e = document.getElementsByClassName('markup--strong');for (var i = 0; i < e.length; i++) {e[i].style.fontWeight = 'normal'}The serifs are short enough that I couldn't see them all on my regular screen (particularly the right-hand serif on the lowercase 'w'). But on my phone I would be able to see it perfectly well. On a high-DPI screen, the text isn't blurry or anything. They didn't focus on the rendering at all it seems, but made their screenshots in high resolution.
Here's the data (ignoring the countries that have no stereotypes):
AR: ["good at rugby"]
AU: ["good looking"]
BR: ["good-looking","good at football","rude","beautiful","good at soccer"]
BT: ["happy"]
CA: ["good at hockey"]
CH: ["rich","healthy","happy","good at making watches","thin","rude","miserable","neutral","boring","weird","reserved"]
CN: ["good at diving","rich","rude","good at table tennis","cruel","thin","smart","good at weightlifting","short","cruel to dogs","loud","weird","good at badminton","rude reddit"]
CU: ["good at boxing"]
CZ: ["rude","atheist"]
DE: ["serious","good at football"]
DK: ["happy","tall","racist","weird","rude","attractive"]
ES: ["rude","noisy","loud","lazy","cruel to animals","good at motogp","short","good looking"]
ET: ["beautiful"]
FI: ["quiet","smart","ugly"]
FR: ["rude","thin","good at cooking","mean","short","negative","gay","good at maths","healthy","skinny","good at math","google feud","snobby","bad at english"]
GB: ["good at war","weird","rude","good at sport","full of grief and despair","polite","good at rowing","smart","cold","good at music","reserved","sarcastic","cynical","pale","miserable"]
ID: ["short"]
IE: ["proud","thick","religious","rude","sad","strong","mean","cool","angry","pale","stubborn","short","tough","friendly","white","nice"]
IL: ["hard to work with"]
IN: ["smart","beautiful","rude","short","good at math"]
IR: ["beautiful","smart","proud"]
JP: ["weird","healthy","thin","polite","cruel","smart","small","disciplined","attracted to brand names","clean","short","rude","cute","rich","quiet"]
LB: ["rich","rude","beautiful","white","racist","violent","hated in australia","hot","successful","stupid","smart","liberal","aggressive"]
MX: ["mean","smart"]
NG: ["loud","rude"]
NL: ["tall","rude","good looking","attractive","tanned","tolerant","good at hockey","mean","smart","tight","beautiful","good at english","blunt","happy","liberal","tall yahoo"]
NP: ["beautiful","rude","short","brave","strong","ugly","proud"]
PH: ["rude","small","mean","loud","nice","good at singing"]
PL: ["arrogant","rude","strong","big","miserable","proud"]
PK: ["beautiful","white","rude","rich","smart","tall"]
PR: ["loud","proud","rude"]
PT: ["rude","dark","short","hot","loud"]
RO: ["beautiful"]
RU: ["beautiful","rude","rich","cold","tall","strong","good at chess","mean"]
SD: ["tall","dark","ugly","violent","black","skinny"]
SE: ["good at english","happy"]
SN: ["tall","dark"]
SS: ["dark","tall"]
TF: ["rude","thin","good at cooking","mean","short","negative","gay","good at maths","healthy","skinny","good at math","google feud","snobby","bad at english"]
TH: ["skinny"]
TW: ["annoying","rich","rude","friendly","skinny","proud","pretty","nice","stupid"]
US: ["rude","proud","loud","big","unhappy","tall","anxious","good at swimming"]
VN: ["rude","fiercely nationalistic","short","smart","skinny","pretty","loud","mean","good at nails","thin","dark"]
YE: ["dark"]
Funny that more are "rude" than not.Does that mean you can use it on the virtual terminal screens? If so, that's pretty cool.