11101010010001

Guess Jensen didn't read the terms and conditions...

Do you still like their product or do you now understand your bias?

we learn the falseness of human exceptionalism at different rates, some learn it on their death beds.

ya the trick is to have negative expectations.

For philosophical consistency, one should therefore not hang out with your own child if they are bad.

My advice, is don't take advice.

yes, there are personalities, but, please do not teach them to stereotype.

if quality is the currency, then we can be open and transparent about the code and software that we use. I suspect that most of the software that I use is crap, and was so even before AI came along. Maybe AI can actually make this crappy software better?

Is this just an argument to plead insanity? I wonder why this rarely works.

A living like anybody else or a living at the expense of everybody else?

Let's be clear that this is just an opinion and ignores China for example.

What were we excited about before? The unknown? There is still plenty of that. Now is there is this machine that lies between us and the unknown.

global warming is a global problem and instead, we're all just playing the prisoner's dilemma.

Perhaps math speaks for itself, but this is certainly not the case in other fields.

Most of the time, you just have to learn what makes the new trick the same as the old trick.

As a teacher, this is obvious. But when you ask a student 'do you want to learn?' they don't actually understand the question.

The overworked doctor symptom, while real, is artificially created. There are plenty of people who want to be (and CAN be) doctors. Let more people be doctors.

AI is just confirming what was known by some but not by those who make decisions...you don't need thousands of coders to run a website.

It was this way before AI.

I thought pg was trying to live forever. Has he learned LLMs from scratch?

the punched in the face expression is strange here. I get it but I also presume that you have never been punched in the face much like you never connected (that's the word you are looking for, also a boxing term) with art.

Great parents are invisible.

add time to the dimension and we'll find out what we already knew ... momentum kills.

publications would likely lead to regulation, if the SEC was properly resourced.

read Ron Maimon.

Both your statement and the OPs are an appeal to expertise which is not a substitute for the scientific method.

Very much this. Very funny to see we're back to hardware is still hard.

All these analogies are just bad. If we are going to live with LLMs, let's reason from first principles. 'It feels like we're just going to be left with analogies'.

The problem is we keep learning that learning doesn't scale and there is nothing we can do about.

What is the current scientific proof for Game Boy Advance at age 6?