If labels make you uncomfortable maybe that aversion itself is something worth holding and looking at.
48 karma · joined December 7, 2018
If labels make you uncomfortable maybe that aversion itself is something worth holding and looking at.
That's roughly 75:25
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/12/tic-tac-ufo-video-q-...
The commanding officer in this indicent, David Fravor, who saw the objects first-hand did a podcast episode with Lex Fridman:
I'm not sure but I think the above poster was making the point that saying 'more' or 'less' evolved implies the possibility of a generalised qualitative measuring of mutations.
Tried to build something that reflected my personality. Had the most fun with the contact page 'copied' popup.
Built from scratch with React-create-app and no other libraries
My point here to be more clear is that we simply don't need to consume animals, and that the taste pleasure of eating them doesn't justify their death. Humans are animals too, and the success of our species doesn't require intense suffering of another.
If you have the time and stomach I'd recommend search up slaughterhouse footage. I'll let you judge for yourself what they're feeling in those moment.
I eat many things, but nothing from animals :)
Since there actually exists real-life animal abuse in the case of paying for meat or any animal product ( including dairy ).
Most humans are also fully capable and arguably evolved to do things like steal and murder each other, are those also justified simply because we're capable? And on the second point, the existence of OPs article and the comments around this one indicate that some people do care.