3,671 karma · joined November 24, 2012
We have interviews where we aren't allowing the use of it (yet interviewees are using stealth AIs to cheat). At the same time, I am also hearing of organizations mandating the use of it, ie: "20% of the code committed needs to be generated". There's probably a set of orgs that exist that do not allow the use of AI in coding interviews, yet practically mandate the use of AI in day-to-day work!
We are at an inflection point I think, but my guess is AI is going to win out soon enough.
I guess mega geniuses make mistakes too...
Local H, "Eddie Vedder", 1996
I have taken a role like this before, but when I did so, I was making a lateral move from a compensation standpoint. This is without factoring in any expected value of equity (because there was none).
I would love for the author to cite their sources on this but I do find it vibes with my experience.
In the tech world, it's not uncommon for founders to attract enough investment to at least pay themselves something before they have any revenue. But in lot of lines of business you can work very hard shouldering massive responsibilities, and take home almost nothing.
“Just because you look the part, doesn’t mean you can play, ask Manute Bol.” - Sage Francis
I'm not sure Manute is actually a great example but it's still a good line.
When I was playing sports back 25 years ago, I heard the expression "looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane" more than once.
Maybe start a blog for the board, and create that article?
Signed, Non-expert in content marketing