I wish we could get rid of the whole rancid bunch of politicians, and hire some company to take care of it all with dignity.
642 karma · joined July 13, 2016
I wish we could get rid of the whole rancid bunch of politicians, and hire some company to take care of it all with dignity.
Just seems a bit stretched. never-gonna-profit
In Typescript anyway, `const` means I am not allowed to reassign. Attempting to change it just will cause compiler warnings. If you mean that, ignore Typescript and tooling, and that once the code is in the browser executing, then consts can be changed.... Who cares about that?
Please also check http://fl.corge.net/ because it contains outrageous amounts of outstanding code.
However I get the point, but I feel it is important to stress this difference that you bring up.
My 18 year old clueless self seen turtleshell.com randomly, thought it was amazing, looked up flash, did stuff in Flash, 10 years later OOP. 10 years after that, software engineering.
My 18 year old clueless self today would want to be like "somethingcool.com" but I would have to troll through about 12 months of tutorials to see something on the screen.
I'd work in a factory.
I know that is ridiculous, but I remember a "1mp" camera was advertised everywhere as a thing for a phone to have. It wasn't that long ago really.
Let's say your 2040 Iphone captures 4000mp of the entire visible scene. Then you have some special software that unicorns everything into amazing sauce.
I know this is all pretty whimsical, but none the less, I feel that the path we are going down is one that Nikon and Canon can't finish.
This is how I knew I was getting old.
What good is a tin of beans compared to killing the craving for a smoke for an hour? No contest.
So as a TypeScript guy with AssemblyScript at my fingertips, what doors does that open for me?
I occasionally have to make HTML5 games in Canvas. Is this the kind of path where WebAssembly could be beneficial?
One day will there simply be an end build step to turn everything into web assembly or is it never intended for use with the DOM?
I don't use my work email for personal use, but what kind of company would fire me for "Alright love, you want a pizza when I am on my way back?".
What is next? "Excuse me Sir, Excuse me Sir, Can I go to the toilet please?" Fuck working for a place like that. Leave your dignity at the door.
I remember implementing an "<iron-ajax>" tag, and thinking that this is so wild and "Out There" that I may simply never understand.
Annoyingly, there is a whole "Hybrid" mode as well. So there is no distinction between V1 and V2. If you are confused,you go to the docs, they aren't giving you what you need, so you go to one of the sample elements, and it is written in V1. So you have to read the migration guide to translate what is actually happening....
Then Polymer Summit happens, and now it is all JS based which, is far better for me but now it seems pointless to stay on Polymer 2.0, and Polymer 3 is a preview with no docs...
So I aborted this path, went to Angular and to be honest, it is beautiful. It is almost trivial compared to the bag of questions and confusion I had going on with Polymer.
I do look forward to going back there though when 3.0 is available.
Although in any case, nothing justifies the pricetag dished out to audio enthusiasts.
I just wondered though, from a birds eye view, does using wasm effectively give you control of everything within the "frame" of your browser?
Can I get rid of the DOM(boilerplate aside), get rid of CSS?
For example HTMLCanvasElement is a flat surface. I can do what I want within it as a scene graph renderer.
Could I do that with wasm? Could I invent my own 2D entities (x, y, width, height). My own 2D Constraints resize like Apple Devices etc?
I may be the same as you only I was a 90s rap kid, the entire directory of music I have collected since the 00s could be considered violent and hateful.