Just because a reproduction is by hand versus machine doesn't change the fact that it is a copy.
2 karma · joined April 3, 2009
I don't see Andy's side at all.
The artwork is a copy, used for commercial purposes and without permission.
Copyright restricts copying. This isn't fair use. It isn't a parody or an even an homage – which can blur the line.
Flip the coin.
You can be more interesting by providing information or point of view that isn't expected. Embrace your broadness and don't siphon yourself off into well defined silos.