716 karma · joined November 9, 2014
Verifying my Blockstack ID is secured with the address 1N99cmSNnQHLbAuxBcCQqnSRNWZgwxgMc8 https://explorer.blockstack.org/address/1N99cmSNnQHLbAuxBcCQqnSRNWZgwxgMc8
[Verifying my OpenPGP key: openpgp4fpr:74b1f67d8e43a94a755407689ccce36402cb49a6]
Avid amateur security and linux enthusiast. Also into molecular simulations and Quantum Computing. More here: https://rgoswami.me
EDIT: So the payment is to have a little space on their own website, which they call a "project page" e.g. https://notbyai.fyi/hi/not-by-ai/
They suggest "linking to it for verification", but it really seems both unnecessary and optional
However the absolute times are still probably not noticable unless you often cold-start terminals.
| Alacritty | Foot | Foot Client |
Absolute time (ms) | 99.0 | 37.2 | 22.8 |Though of course, the memory usage on modern machines is really not a major issue, but the configuration update, along with the tmux session death was annoying..
EDIT: Some timing metrics..
foot -s &
hyperfine --warmup 8 'alacritty -e true' 'foot -e true' 'footclient -e true'
Benchmark 1: alacritty -e true
Time (mean ± σ): 99.0 ms ± 14.2 ms [User: 58.5 ms, System: 33.4 ms]
Range (min … max): 82.7 ms … 148.3 ms 32 runs
Benchmark 2: foot -e true
Time (mean ± σ): 37.2 ms ± 2.3 ms [User: 40.3 ms, System: 9.5 ms]
Range (min … max): 33.8 ms … 43.7 ms 83 runs
Benchmark 3: footclient -e true
Time (mean ± σ): 22.8 ms ± 4.3 ms [User: 0.9 ms, System: 0.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 18.2 ms … 63.6 ms 133 runs
Summary
footclient -e true ran
1.63 ± 0.32 times faster than foot -e true
4.35 ± 1.03 times faster than alacritty -e true[1] https://hn.algolia.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fagner.org%2Foptimize...
EDIT: Updated to elide personal information
iCal is a big draw though, Linux calendars are terrible and since thunderbird choked and left xul Mailmate is attractive too.
A tip from over ten years of FOSS : never try to track your FOSS code, nothing good can possibly come of it