1,560 karma · joined July 4, 2019
But overall very cool and impressive.
characterized as left-wing, right-wing, populist, nationalist, and conservative
and:
Ideology: Populism, Swedish nationalism, Left-conservatism, Anti-corruption, Anti-establishment, Anti-immigration
Political position: Syncretic
So basically everyone can (dis)like it for some reason...
Ofc it's probably for the better if it's to have a chance to spread at least a little.
What? Elsevier doesn't pay reviewers either.
Rather toothless. No experienced user is using their ISP's DNS anyway.
That's not very much.
An alternative explanation is that "toxic comments" protect wikipedia from low quality content, acting as defense mechanism against bad editors. So without better study which tries to analyze if the critique (regardless of toxicity) is justified, it's absolutely useless to make any conclusions from the article.