While computers have more confidential data. The article implies that the big company sold them to be destroyed.
119 karma · joined March 30, 2021
While computers have more confidential data. The article implies that the big company sold them to be destroyed.
Nothing, I think, since there’s no indication the normalized email will be used to send email.
The normalization is for connecting together identities against the wish of the user, which is a different issue.
Using the terms software supply chain security to point out that no supplier exist to work with or blame, seems fair enough.
Nice write up, but leaves me wondering how this works formally.
My main guesses:
1.) There will be a vote to formally accept the new changes, but it’s treated as a done deal.
2.) The governor can formally edit the text to say anything she wants, and it’s up to the legislature to protest afterwards.
Once you swap to a higher precision format for an actual database search, you get all the messiness from the article.
That’s a nice outcome, but also leave you vulnerable to outsiders deciding to ruin your sub by flooding it with discussions of table tennis or racism or arguing about moderation.
But you make a good point if the differences between the OP and Reddit.
We don’t want the dealership to keep the key, but we do want them to give us a new one if we lose it.
So afaik we trust the manufacturer to keep the info, and to keep sufficient logs that anyone that abuses it to steal cars can be caught.
I don’t think the way this is works can be extended to communications apps though.
Both.
The EU people are large companies that can afford the legal costs, and capable of either changing charger or not.
The US people are small business that can often not afford the legal costs (ie settle wether guilty or not), and completely following the law is almost impossible if a manual mistake on a single video opens liability.
Seems trial date is January 2023. He’s still doing it, but possibly some pushback from the legal system regarding standing (do you really intend to come back there)
Your only interpreter for the data is the entire game engine. By design it's going to use most of the power of the target hardware, so cannot run faster. Ie, 30 minute load time if you had played 30 min.
That does not at all help people who reuse passwords from one site on another.
Yeah, four queries for the four requirements seems the most straightforward, and easier to maintain than the final version.
But still a very nice illustrating of group by cube.
SELECT year, sales, income FROM ( SELECT year, COUNT(*) sales, SUM(price) income FROM sales ) AS innerquery WHERE sales > 10 AND income < 1000;
"A lawful order from a circuit court judge is a serious thing. While we vehemently disagree with Campbell's order with respect to the video itself, we have chosen to take it down pending our appeal.
But the portion of the order compelling us to remove the entirety of Daulerio's post—his words, his speech—is grossly unconstitutional. We won't take it down"
If it's your stance that an interface designed to be interpreted by a program cannot be RESTful, then you could just shorten your rant to 'REST APIs cannot exist by definition'. It would save time. It's fair enough to be annoyed by words changing meaning I suppose.
It also seems like your RESTful system definition would include any server serving up straight html without client side scripting.
And also use the local client to scan unknown links? They probably dont want outsiders to have access to this code.
So it's possible, but don't know how easy it is for the uploader.
The mathematics are similar from the ensurer/casino side. However:
1. The happiness impact of losing 5x your net worth (house burnt down, eternal debt) is likely much bigger than gaining it.
2. It's harder to repeat sell insurance to someone until they are broke, compared to a slot machine.
https://www.cracked.com/article_31344_the-maddening-story-of...
(Edited for premature send)
The sensor and stabilizer on the right side are flexible.
My preferred work flow would be to open the csv, change some formatting, then reinterpret the original data.
It would require keeping two sets of data for each cell, but that seems to already be the case since F2-enter on each cell would accomplish exactly that. Last I tried.