666 karma · joined November 25, 2013
The experiment looks like "Steal my compute/storage scaling money and uptime", and it barely matters that there is some Bitcoin behind it: a company could lose more than $2000 if agents constantly break its website.
AI verification: AI meticulously abuses all available loopholes to deliver answer expected by operator, rather than actually responding to the problem.
Simplest example: proof that `x+1 > x` (borderline impossible)
The hilarious part is that one of the private keys is literally "4".
> A designed web version with the same text and diagrams is in docs/index.html; turn on GitHub Pages for the /docs folder to serve it.
Yeah, the author did not even reads the slop Claude produces.
> - ?
Bad Apple, oh, wait: https://github.com/hsfzxjy/Bad-Apple-Font
Imagine that during the Cold War US would concentrate all efforts to block nuclear research and basic physics classes, because it is unsafe, ahhh
Congrats to Apple achieving nation-wide tracking, embedding some kind of yellow dots[1], but this time this time this is based on strong cryptography and non-removable, targeting people who don't use AI under the slogan "we are fighting AI fakes", but people still "love the feature".
Ahh, GPT-2 is too dangerous to be released!
The honest seam is obvious: claudish works; imitation does not. That’s not nothing.
If you are not asking them they turn into a pumpkin. Babysit them like junior devs (but braindead), pay monthly subscription to model providers, pay for extra tokens, and/or buy RAM$$$ to get 2-digits TPS.
To the moon!
(There is no logic in this message, btw.)
> almost everyone has misaddressed
Almost no-one, unless we are talking about LLMs and Google Translate users who could attempt map translations 1-to-1. Oh well, a new AI generated fake piece was published, see it soon in the "Did you know ..." section of enwiki.
- Over the /last few days/ there has been a lot of discussion about open-source systems, especially those that are not made in US. (implying that these discussions appeared just now)
- Reports suggest that /some US officials/ are considering banning the use of these open-source systems by US companies. (implying somebody other than their corrupted representatives support this ban)
And then switching to a complete gaslighting regarding manufacturing capabilities of US vs China, about "open-source can not be trusted", about "GPT-2 is too dangerous to release"
On top of that, I retried the same question + one simple question, and again, same behavior - second JC chat is loading forever. That's more just a funny observation over Gemini - today this is very likely some internal issue, tomorrow it can be used for plausible deniability against copyright accusations.
5 minutes later: all previous chats are loading fine, but the only "Counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture" chat is not loading.
Well, I'm not a conventional conspiracy theorist. But everyone knows that in every major LLM provider there are hell of hidden guarding systems that mark users and dialogues based on content (for topics about national security, biology, security, adult topics, etc.) - so there is a small chance a CEO of Google is now receiving a dozens of notifications about "ground-breaking results that could be attributed to Gemini, if act quick". So if any of thousands researchers have ever submitted this polynomial to Claude previously, any Anthropic employee can accidentally or intentionally "rediscover" the result of other researcher (and even hide the traces by deleting a dialogue of other user).
Quick check: Ctrl+F genuine - 50 times, honest - 57 times, ethic[al] - 116 times, safe - 110 times, epistemic - 18 times. And why actually it is baked into LLM - probably because human reviewers consistently gave higher scores for answers that contained these words (it is now when people are sick of it - I can imagine that on early stages it looked not as bad - maybe reviewers trusted more when they saw the word "honest" and "genuine")