I can share one trick. Ask it to translate your post into Spanish or French, and then ask it to translate it back. You will see how most of the standard phrases disappear
I have been in this game for over 30 years. I haven't seen one bad backtest yet. All of them are fantastic, except they all fall apart in real trading. It is hard for me to believe anymore in any kind of "breakthroughs" in Futures Index Trading. It would be pretty hard to convince me. That said, starting with the backtest results, Sharpe, etc., would be a good idea. Publishing actual backtest trades would also be good.
You are right, of course I was in a rush to type, so I misspoke. What I meant to say is that computational simulations of consciousness may make it impossible for anyone to definitively diagnose whether it is a simulation or real consciousness. So, computational simulation of consciousness may render any consciousness detection tools useless. Again, my apologies for my earlier mistake.