517 karma · joined March 18, 2019
Maybe a non-24 hour station and passersby just assumed it was maintenance? But do they not have security cameras?
Based on your track record, I fully expect an update to come out where it turns out this Khosla guy's 89 acre property doesn't actually exist, it was actually 8.9 acres magnified with an extremely elaborate mechanism of smoke and mirrors.
The fumes exposure is probably just due to the person's proximity to the job site, not from a plumbing connection.
I tore one of my left biceps tendons training for an MMA fight about five years ago. When the doctors told me "six month recovery" I didn't understand that they meant six months to start working out like the average person again. That led me to have a lot of frustration during my recovery because I felt like it wasn't happening fast enough. It was closer to 18 months until I was able to perform at the level I did before.
Did you get a graft or just a repair?
And no KGB type entity would whisk you away in the night for saying any of them. It's even vague whether or not the FCC ever even enforced it at all. Hell, it's kinda vague on whether or not it was even a rule before George Carlin's comedy bit. The Supreme Court later even ruled it as...too vague.
https://jalopnik.com/this-ancient-laptop-is-the-only-key-to-...
We shall all be woven into the fabric of the new artificial reality.
They said "manufactured" not "mined"
Palladium today is $1704.73 per ounce, but the price of palladium comes from the fact that it's extremely rare on Earth. But what if someone comes back from an asteroid with an amount of palladium that suddenly triples the worldwide supply? What will the effects be on the price point? I'm sure the costs of getting it back planetside will be factored in and slow down any inflation, but I am still curious.
And what kind of things could we create, given a vastly increased supply of rare elements?
There's much more to my life than being a programmer, that's just what I do for work. My life does not revolve around it.
If I were to get fired for "not responding fast enough" or something like that, then I wouldn't want to work at that place anyway. I'm a programmer and I get paid to program, so that's what I do. It's worked out pretty well so far :)
I wish someone had told me it was that easy sooner!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Terrail,_seigneur_de_Ba...
Anyway, I think we've gone off track from the original point, which was that full size launch vehicles taking off slow isn't because of gimbals vs. fins, it's because they're big and heavy.
We can be pedantic and say it's specifically because of a low T-W ratio, but the T-W is low because the weight is high and it's not practical to build a massive rocket engine to increase it.
And yeah, sheer weight definitely has something to do with the thrust to weight ratio. It's half the equation.
Scale it down a ways to something like a RIM-116 and you can see the scale come into play. This thing goes from launch to almost disappearing over the horizon in under three seconds and then hits the target.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVk9VnUkvaU
Granted, that RIM-116 does have fins. So let's take the fins away and scale up to something like a Polaris SLBM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUlXty69-Y8
Still unbelievably fast, same with the Tridents. These get popped up out of the water before they fire their main engines. It's basically free standing in the air when it fires the main and it still shoots off super fast.