MindBeams

It is a capitalism issue.

But it's also a free speech issue. You're conflating free speech and the First Amendment, but they are not the same thing, and matters of free speech do not begin and end with the First Amendment.

CEOs represent their companies. "The company didn't say it, the CEO did" is a nonsensical distinction.

You admitted earlier that they are:

Person you replied to: they intentionally use suggestive language that leads people to think AI is approaching human cognition. This helps with hype, investment, and PR.

Your response: As do all companies in the world. If you want to buy a hammer, the company will sell it as the best hammer in the world. It's the norm.

>they're doing sales and marketing and it's you that interprets this as possible/true.

You've moved the goalpost from "they're not saying it" to "they're saying, but you're not supposed to believe it."

Corporations are motivated by profit, not doing what's best for humanity. If you need an example of "large organizations conspiring against us," I can give you twenty.

You're being disingenuous. The tweet was talking about asserting the existence of fake articles, claiming that a paper was written in one year while summarizing a paper that explicitly says it was written in another, and severe hallucinations. Nowhere does she even imply that she's looking for superintelligence.

The productivity benefits of remote work options have been resoundingly proven by now. This person doesn't truly care about maximizing productivity.

Holding yourself to a different (lower) standard than your employees is not the mark of a fair person.

Your workers are not less valuable than you. You should treat them better.

That would be horrible for workers. Let's not establish that sort of precedent; if you do the job, remote or not, you get paid equally. Even assuming a slight productivity bump, John doesn't deserve more money than Dave just because he schleps himself to the office.

Because managers likely prefer it due to corporate peacocking. The article clearly says this.

This thread is rampant with anti-intellectualism that deserves to be called out.

Did you mix those up on purpose?

>"285368737954-83645" is... well I have to assume somewhere in the 10-100K range?

83645 is five digits, so certainly in the ~10,000 range.

It's definitely standard, but in what way is it clearer? An abbreviation is never more clear than the full thing it abbreviates.

EDIT: I saw your explanation below, and you make a very good point.

This level of thinly veiled insecurity is just projection on your part.

It sucks that people understanding their own language marks them as possibly AI.

>Mr. White

As opposed to what, exactly?

"Much" and "many" are not interchangeable:

"I have too many water in the cup."

"How much people are in attendance?"

These sound obviously incorrect.

This sort of anti-intellectualism is the perfect antidote for those who claim that improper grammar is nothing more than evidence of language "evolving."

And it all comes full-circle.

It's inevitable that I'll still have to filter search results by Reddit to find genuine information, but if the only option for Reddit is the official app/website, I'll just stop browsing and commenting altogether. I don't understand how their official app could remain so bad.