91 karma · joined September 21, 2023
I would not take that as a given for Mozilla's upper management. Many of their decisions seem to ignore what users want in deference to Google or other motivations.
> I got a Nitrokey3 to use as a hardware token, and ended up not being able to access my country's e-gov facilities, because L1 certification required.
What will likely happen is that many services will only accept passkey managers that have been blessed by big tech and locked down to the user. You're not going to be able to authenticate with your bank using an open source implementation.
The text chat version of Omegle could have easily been hosted on a single server with some kind of automated spam protection. Donations could have more than covered the costs to run it. The positive value it added to millions of lives far outweighs the negative.
It appears to me like a sophisticated and coordinated operation, not the accidental result of bureaucracy.
Generally the rules will be something like you remain a tax resident of your old state, regardless of how long you stay abroad, until you establish a new permanent tax residency (whether in a new state or country).
What I eventually did is return to the US, sign a 1 month lease in Florida so I could get a drivers license and register to vote, and then return abroad. According to my tax accountant, that was enough.
Could you clarify what you find interesting about it? I skimmed their website and looks like just a lightning wallet. Am I missing some key feature that helps one interact with fiat systems?
I've been doing it for the last 7 years without any problems.
Wasn't that just a cash grab? Everyone threw some buzz words in a white paper and made a pretty landing page hoping to take advantage of the hype.
I don't understand what you mean by "waste" or how that led to coordination. Most of those founders didn't even spend the money raised on anything, they just pocketed it.
The value of crypto has always been in its ability to take the power to control the financial freedom of individuals away from government and put it back in the hands of people.
Whether you agree that is a good thing or not, depends on your political views towards authoritarian governments.
What makes you think there is coordination rather than natural incentives that drive individuals to act in similar ways?
Sure it could make politics more polarized, but hopefully that will result in greater diversity of governments under which one can choose to live. Anything that gets us away from a monoculture and a single world-government is a good thing in my mind.