80 karma · joined March 8, 2019
I was in the market for a year and was interested in something outside of a city. I could afford the larger 5 bedroom homes, but had absolutely no use for that amount of space. Nice 2 bedroom homes in the suburbs just aren't a thing for some reason. Smaller homes exist, but the quality drops dramatically.
Perhaps there is an untapped market for high quality 1-2 bedroom homes outside of cities. I'd certainly buy one.
That's absolutely fine, but I feel like a reservation/ticketing system such as the one proposed is not the best solution. Again, a tourism tax across the city might achieve the same effect without such a system.
In my opinion, the cost (within reason) is absolutely irrelevant. Raising money for the city and locals is a great effort and I applaud it. It is simply the requirement of yet another "hoop to jump through" that bothers me. After years of a pandemic with legally questionable restrictions and requirements throughout daily life, I simply don't want more "hoops to jump through".
If raising money via tourism is the goal, a more widespread tourism tax on food and services would likely both raise funds and partially reduce tourism overload, without the burden of requiring visitors to go through the arcane process of booking a visit.
I've been prescribed a "fairly serious" antibiotic for a skin condition that has been plaguing me for several years (I've gotten like 5 different diagnosis and tons of different Rx). I'm otherwise incredibly healthy, so this antibiotic scares the shit out of me and I have yet to start taking it.
There's been this trend of new firms popping up that acquire small ecommerce brands (in fact, there was one on HN just the other day). I'm wondering if the same model can (or has) been applied to small "indie" companies and projects.
It sounds like you decided to build a business before coming up with an idea that could be a business.
In the end, how did you decide what to build?
Is that simply a perception you think many might investors have? Tesla has lost money every year, while Toyota has showed substantial profit. Without knowing anything else about these companies, an outside observer might think Tesla was the "bloated" of the two.
• Reduced flight hours and maintenance on fleet aircraft.
• Instructors do not need to be pulled from schedules.
• Fleet aircraft do not need to be hard scheduled.
• Cost per flight hour is much lower for common aggressor platforms (A-4, L-39, F1M, and now these legacy F-18s) than the aircraft the Air Force is training in.
• Private companies can more easily maintain and source parts for aircraft the military cannot (Migs, for instance).
This particular sale was the remainder of the RAAF's retired F-18 fleet, which Canada started buying in early 2019. These are _not_ Super Hornets.
Some of these companies have been around for decades. Some competitors:
• ATAC
• Top Air
• Draken
Is there reason to believe this is not the case?
As an aside, has anyone ever purchased a lab grown diamond? What was your experience? Where did you purchase it?
a.) Manually modify your web page either through the existing files hosted by your provider, or by pushing something via ftp/git.
b.) Use a content management system (CMS), either custom or third party, to update content using whatever methods are in place (usually some sort of dashboard).
Additionally, note that many popular site builders (e.g. Squarespace) offer a mobile app for editing on the go.
Why?
AFAIK most big banks have APIs, and it would seem to me the use cases for needing to access an account programmatically are few.
I'm interested in hearing which, if you care to share.
Regardless, very cool.
[0]: https://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/ [1]: https://spacenews.com/esa-spacecraft-dodges-potential-collis...
That said, it would be quite exciting to see all those launches, and the end goal is a worthy one.
What's the project? Any links?