607 karma · joined March 8, 2023
About 30 years ago a pilot in a floatplane was on step as he went under a bridge (he was still in the water, but the floats ride closer to the surface than when it's at near-idle speeds). When the FAA somehow got wind of this, they really put the screws on him because in their interpretation he was flying under the bridge (very illegal), even though he wasn't airborne. Nowhere to my knowledge did the FARs make this distinction between floating and flying. You'd think in a case like this they'd let it go, maybe update the rules to clarify, but they really went after him for it.
Can't really give an example question, it's been well over a decade (closer to two) since I took it.
Some people are just wired differently.
Imagine the information that isn't public about their misdeeds.
As it is, states and corporations externalize the costs of hacks to the victims of their incompetence. They have no reason to take opsec seriously because they aren't held liable in even the most egrigious cases. Data should be a liability.
At some point we need to start treating data as a liability.
IME it's not much different from having a fiber-heavy diet.
I wonder if opening GPT and DALLE to the public was partly intended to pollute subsequent data for anyone that gets into AI down the road. Suddenly a lot of publicly accessible data is worth less, leaving only players who've got a hoard of time-stamped data to compete with (like Google, Facebook). OpenAI almost certainly has the hashes of what it spits out too, so they'll be able to sort the wheat from the chaff for a while yet.
The market for data may be getting interesting.
I basically don't post too many opinions unless I'm on an alt account, and I'm considering tor for that going forward.
If everything is going digital, this will be necessary for visually impaired people to access critical information.
You might be able to address this through the WM, which would be a fantastic accesibility feature.