It makes sense to try to eliminate it even though it's "only" a small difference. Might as well remove the difference at all and look out for things with no HFCS shoved in it for no reason.
301 karma · joined October 31, 2016
It makes sense to try to eliminate it even though it's "only" a small difference. Might as well remove the difference at all and look out for things with no HFCS shoved in it for no reason.
There's also a free version with a few features restricted here: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/commander-one-file-manager/id1...
When so many models are trained on illegally-obtained data (libgen, etc.) and provide profit without acknowledgement to the folks whose creative output made said profit possible in the first place, it feels really icky to put it lightly.
What's more, the creative process is about pulling something out from inside of you, examining your ideas and yourself, and maybe showing it to the world. Feedback from others, editors or readers or whatever, is a reciprocation of that. Or if you keep it to yourself, you've learned and grown anyway, and have honed your craft for the next time you try it.
What reward is there in computer mimicry? How does AI empower this process?
From a commercial aspect it all sucks. Creatives are devalued and the creative process is arrested. This isn't new, though. Ever since we started calling entertainment "content," you could see it coming. It's a struggle Hollywood's faced since the studio system, even before. We had the subversives in the Code era, the new wave people, the auteurs, and so on, all fighting that good fight against the business people who spoke only in dollars and cents. So it was, so it shall be.
I don't think there will be an AI takeover in creative writing, except for maybe a hiccup where slop content creators chase gold. Already a couple of romance writers accidentally published stories with prompts left in them and have instantly ruined their reputations forever. I think the people interested in reading what a machine wrote are the people interested in making the machine write. Everyone else wants something from a real human.
Are you genuinely arguing that LLM output is derivative, and human output is derivative, therefore they're equal? Why don't you pop that thesis into ChatGPT and see how it answers.
I'm sure it's similar for many other metro transport options in the USA. California in particular has a rough go for many reasons.
It doesn't even have to be something bad or happen to you. One "my buddy had his bike stolen off the light rail" and several people will be turned off of ever trying to use it.
Even if the dude tries to paint the internet with Wordpress's brains, I'm confident I will have time (and the impetus, finally) to find an acceptable alternative for my workflow. I'm open to suggestions.
Also, as I mentioned to a sibling response, the upkeep really is not that much work. It's a personal blog and takes a grand total of three (maybe four) clicks to update every once in a while.
I personally don't think it's that much work, and definitely not complicated, to keep my software up to date. And as a blog all I need to do is cache / throw behind a CDN and I'm golden. Nothing complex going on here. No headaches, no late nights, not even a wink of worry.
If I were choosing a CMS or tech stack for a critical piece of infrastructure my requirements would be different and I might find some other tool.
Also, if all these were so much concern, I doubt so much of the web would run on Wordpress. Yes, you need to keep your install and plugins up to date. But you need to keep your toolchain up to date no matter what you use. Risk of breakage on update is a thing everywhere, not just Wordpress. I'm by no means a Wordpress fan, but it really is not as bad as it's painted.
My update process is:
- Click a button to back up
- Click a button to update everything
- Open my blog to make sure it still looks normal
Definitely not onerous. To be fair I don't use many plugins, and my theme is very simple. I don't think a plain old blog doesn't need many plugins.
Sometimes I take a break from blogging. I don't want to have to read documentation on how my SSG works (either my own docs or docs on some website) to remember the script to generate the updates, or worry about deploying changes, or fiddling with updates that break my scripts, or anything like that. I do stuff like this for my day job.
I like my blogging experience to be focused on a single thing: writing.
As I fell into the SSG pit I found I mostly wrote about and fooled around with the SSG itself, instead of all the things I originally planned on writing about and doing. So I threw away the SSG and installed Wordpress and stopped caring. It's been liberating.
If the goal is to tinker and write about the tinkering, that is fine. If you're not like me and the tinkering never gets in the way of the writing, that's also fine. But that wasn't me. I had to learn yet again that the best tool was the one that got out of my way and let me do what I came to do.
The last thing I need when I'm aiming to write is a chance to procrastinate.
Remote: Preferred, BKK acceptable
Technologies: C#, SQL, Python, Delphi, JavaScript/Typescript/etc.
Email: me@tallain.com
Senior backend engineer and integration specialist with 10 + years in .NET/C#, Azure, SQL Server, RabbitMQ, and Vue. I also have experience with Python and Delphi. I've worked on mission critical systems for fintech fraud prevention, public safety, and financial institutions; more recently I've been leading teams and slowly moving away from the world of individual contribution. Currently in Thailand (UTC+7) and fully remote, I’m looking for senior or lead roles -- or short, high‑urgency projects up to a year if you need a contractor who's good at cleaning up messes and stabilizing chaos.
If you're in-office you might do some of these less often. If you're fully remote and your org uses Teams, this is what goes on.
I use a mix of things. For a long time I used vim with some plugins to emulate iA Writer, along with vimwiki for general notes. Now I use Obsidian for notes (general stuff like character bios, tags, ways to track relationships, worldbuilding stuff).
I use iA Writer for a quick outline and first draft because it's simple and distraction-free, and I like its focus mode. Again this can be done with vim, I can send you my .vimrc if you're curious. I just wanted to support the company.
Once the first draft is done, I spin up Scrivener. I put in the notes from the outline into the corkboard view, then paste the draft. I read through it front to back and take notes, usually in iA where the outline was. Then I create a new version of each doc, one by one, and do line edits or rewrites where I see fit. Sometimes I rewrite something wholesale, or split it into multiple scenes, or delete completely.
Scrivener is very handy for this type of work, especially with the corkboard view, which lets you slide things around and see a story from a higher level than headlines or chapter / scene titles would.
I know Scrivener has a focus mode, but I use iA specifically to remove distractions. If I have Scrivener open, I'm tempted to fiddle with things in its UI, or try to take that high-level view too early. iA is for drafting because drafting is supposed to be a single-minded enterprise. There's no room for second thoughts and any loss of momentum kills a story for me.
I'm trying things a little differently right now, by plotting/writing, then revising in between the next set. Think spaced repetition for writing. Every story needs some drawer time before it's revised and edited. I anticipate a small anthology of sorts being ready by the end of the year.
This explicitly does not include insurance costs.
Private health insurance costs are covered by "healthcare spending by major sources of funds" and reached 1.5 trillion, the same dollar amount as hospitals cost as a product group.
Not to say I got everyone to march to my drum -- the "best practices" was a shared effort. As you said, sometimes it just takes someone to call things out. We can do things better. Look at how things improve if you approach X problem in Y manner, or share Z code this way. Maybe the team was overwhelmed before and another voice is enough to tip the scales. If you don't try, you'll never know.
As an American, it's really eye-opening to learn other languages and cultures and apply that context to your work in software.
Location: California, USA
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies: C# (.NET, WPF, Blazor), SQL, Delphi, JavaScript, Typescript, Vue.js, Azure, Docker, Kubernetes, OpenShift, Argo CD, RabbitMQ
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brandonmgandy/
Email: My username at gmail
Resume: On request
I'm searching for a remote, full-time gig, contract is okay but not preferred. I have a lot of experience in a few different sectors, from finance to public safety to integrations and non-profits. I've won an award for being a top performer at a 2500+ person org, and have presented at conferences in front of 300 attendees. I like to think I'm good at what I do.Anyway, Confluence for all its flaw has so much power, is so much more pleasant to use, your business folks won't balk at it. As often as not, we have people from all parts of the company in there, reading and writing both, and it needs to be usable to people of all technical levels. Markdown wikis and their editors don't often meet this criterion, or they're missing on some key features (tables!!).
To me, Confluence's only real down side is that it's an Atlassian product. I wish I could find something to scratch the itch without feeling the need to buy into that whole ecosystem.
It's a steep cliff between one-off integrations and a general platform with workflow/trigger/action type functionality (assuming you do anything like that, since you mentioned Zapier).
In my experience the hardest part of a general solution is all of the one-off custom business logic that each client seems to have, even when integrating the same two systems. There's custom fields, which in one system could be represented as a special object and in another is just another column in a database. There's tons of if-else logic. Etc.
When doing something like field mapping, did you end up creating an internal/intermediary data model to map everything to, or did you end up creating System-A-to-System-B type mappings? How did you end up handling the special cases; is there a sort of scripting system for special and conditional logic or do you have something like a set of predefined transformations / conditionals that can be applied to the data? I'm sure a lot of this could be handled by a workflow/trigger/action system if one were willing and able to go fine-grained enough on the individual steps.
Other than that, what would you say your biggest hurdle has been in getting this thing off the ground and running smoothly without too much babysitting on each individual integration?
Sorry if this is too much or if I'm asking questions about your secret sauce, feel free to ignore, or email me at my username at gmail.
The commenter remarked "we would never have heard of Philip Glass." Who among the laity would have heard of Philip Glass and the people you listed? I expect that Venn diagram is really two circles.