What exactly do you mean? If you ask C/C++ programmers, what they don't like about C/C++ and fix that, you got Rust. C++ wants to stay backwards compatible, which is holding the language back. Rust was a fresh start.
234 karma · joined October 21, 2021
volker.weissmann@gmx.de
What I meant was the following: Take an example Python codebase. Pick a random function. Put a `print(type(arg))` in there. Run it in many different use-cases. Chances are, it will only print a single type. If you do the same in Julia, chances are, it will print multiple very different types.
Not judging and willing to be proved wrong, but the difference seems to be that the left usually wants more censorship, and the right wants less censorship. The far right is usually mad that they got censored but only rarely mad that the left did not get censored. The far left is usually mad that the right did not get censored but only rarely mad that the far left did get censored.
> Because it is not TOPICS that are censored. It is BEHAVIOR.
Again, not judging and willing to be proved wrong, but the right is a lot ... rougher, aggressive ... that the left, even when talking amongst themselves. Pacifists and civil talking people etc. are usually found on the left.
bool c = !(a && b)
why?
Source/proof?
Their product is open source and (assuming the say the truth) keeps the data on the server of the website owner. I would say this is better.
This already exists, it is called https. The s in https stands for security, i.e. encryption and signing.
> The browser could be told not to render anything is the signature does not match the content.
The problem with this statement is that adblockers are part of "The browser". So the browser/the adblocker coud still choose to render something with no signature. Also, what does "rendering" mean? An adblocker changes what "rendering" means: For example, if the html includes the line <img src="https://www.qries.com/images/banner_logo.png" alt="Qries" width="200" height="90"> then the browser will usually request banner_logo.png and show that here. But the browser could also choose not to do that. If qries.com would be in the blocklist of your adblocker, your browser would choose not to send that request and not to show that image.
Customers who chose plans and features with content filtering (e.g. parent controls) do not have access to the iCloud Private Relay to allow these services to work as designed. All other customers have no restrictions.
I don't like that phrasing, because it suggests that having TLS is equally good than not having TLS.
Otherwise, you are right.
Source?
"CO2 pooling risk" "Gas pooling risk" "Risk of suffocation"
What does this sentence mean? (Grammatically, English is my 2nd language).
How?
The problem is that many warning signs don't exist to warn people, but to prevent lawsuits. So they are phrased as generally as possible and often include false positives.
Link please