acct776

Modern phones, when configured correctly, are more secure than their desktop counterparts.

Not for nothing, Dan, it could also be considered rude in some circles to publicly engage with a third party about a person when being addressed by that person.

Can we compromise here?

Saying "seriously" meant, as a security professional, I have a very legitimate, passionate interest in social psychology - not that I wanted to poke fun at someone.

We're all here to analyze and learn from each other - or....should be.

Please don't mistake my curiosity for malice.

Have reviewed them again, for what is likely the dozen'th time - no objective problems.

Could you share your subjective one?

I was being serious, dang - did you read my comment in a positive light first?

> Users have every opportunity

"But that's how I get to the website, I type it into the Google!"

The significance of the project is that there isn't much difference, and the smoothness is largely attributed to driver effort.

Have to be in the mind of the enemy, son.

I was going to say...where do we start...

> They aren't the only no-cost distributor

I couldn't name a second, which means they're probably not getting a huge %.

Highly recommend reading someone's applied essentials guide on certs, and the various methods of accomplishing SSL for self-hosted stuff.

This stuff is much more complicated in isolation from the rest - full picture easiest.

> If our tools require us to be perfect, maybe they're just not good tools for some goals.

> if they failed a few times, that's a pretty strong argument against C++.

Well, they're migrating (at least part of) the codebase to Rust, in a lot of places because of security. Make your own conclusion, I guess?

> The article takes on a subject that has been discussed a lot recently

Mostly by other navel-gazing publications echoing the same fearmongering.

This is how consent is manufactured.

Your mom might have another family in the Greater Toronto Area now, just so you are aware!

Yeah, the IT person who is there Tuesdays and Thursdays, and helps plug unplugged mice in.

Surely they'll be capable of configuring a corporate VPN without a fat budget to have Cisco do it for them...right?

Clear videographic, use of a PIN that only the accused had access to, etc

It shouldn't be considered conspiracy theory that, technically speaking, many things in our nation are an insecure joke, including our system of voting.

How long ago was this? Not to keep pestering you, but, recently the prices of medicinal CBD flower have been halved.

Two people, chronic pain, nobody's had you try CBD edibles, or vaporizing a little CBD herb?

Lineage breaks the Android security model.

I'd use GrapheneOS where possible. Consider making it possible where it's not.

And run that application in a different Android profile - very valuable step.

You wouldn't advertise you were using your personal VPS as a VPN.

Legally? Their neighbors, who are the ones calling.

Dogecoin is fucking killing it...don't ask me or my discarded hard drive during a health crisis how I know.

Link?

> Tbqh I wasn't even aware of that story until now.

Hopefully your CTO was.

Those employers are a net-negative to society, let them die.

Like how Facebook diversified their way into every viral messaging platform besides Snap?

Be more appropriate to rebrand to Coal...or Sun, if they want to be forward thinking.

What does "literally" mean here?

Disagree.

For many applications, especially CRUD, if your UI isn't so obvious someone with low executive function can successfully use it (half asleep, fucked up on some drug including alcohol/prescription), then it's not as low-friction as it could be.