1,570 karma · joined December 2, 2020
I think OPs point is they failed on this part. "Making it happen" should have been ensuring a compliant and approved version of the software was the one made available to the developers. At a large scale that is done via device management, but even at a medium sized enterprise that should have been done via a source management portal of some sort.
That being said I also don't wonder if there is a point where we're just crowdsourcing the police state?
I like this. I'm going to see if my boss will go for me changing my title from Solutions Architect to Solutions Commissioner. I'll insist people refer to me as "Commissioner ajcp"
I love these and I know this is all in good fun, but I feel like this one is a little unfair to Jeff. He's a content creator and he didn't actually buy the rig. If he's rich it's because he creates content like this.
I really would like to know how good this would be for a corporate Internal Audit workflow/professional.
Seems like Google has created a memory-safe decoder for it in Rust or something.
I have come to the same conclusion having built a workflow that has seen 10 million+ non-standardized PDFs (freight bill of ladings) with running evaluations, as well as against the initial "ground-truth" dataset of 1,000 PDFs.
Humans: ~65% accurate
Gemini 1.5: ~72% accurate
Gemini 2.0: ~88% accurate
Gemini 2.5: ~92%* accurate
*Funny enough we were getting a consistent 2% improvement with 2.5 over 2.0 (90% versus 88%) until as a lark we decided to just copy the same prompt 10x. Squeezed 2% more out of that one :D
Que intro: "The gang wastes their time cheating on a dumb benchmark"