al_chemist

Thanks.

What diet was that?

> allows

That word is blackli^Wblocklisted in Google developer documentation style guide.

https://developers.google.com/style/word-list

Raising taxes for poorest* will make more difference than taxing wealthiest. What kind of difference are we trying to make?

* - there are more poor people and there are few wealthy

Can you share an example of real science where advice changed as more data come in?

Science is modern religion.

> I feel that Starlink will drastically alter this market and open up so much more remote working environments

You're not allowed to use Starlink in other location than you ordered. It's not for nomads.

https://www.starlink.com/legal/terms-of-service-preorder

6.3 You acknowledge that you are only authorized to access Services at the location identified on your Order, and you will not divert the Starlink Kit or Services to any other locations

How serious is your typing?

> they were leaving out the difficulty of manufacturing mRNA vaccines in volume

Article is about adenovirus vaccine, not mRNA vaccine.

> isn't divorce a pretty healthy outcome to a marriage

Isn't bankrupcy a pretty healthy outcome to a business?

Isn't death a pretty healthy outcome to life?

Isn't coup a pretty healthy outcome to a country?

Isn't segfault a pretty healthy outcome to program?

Perl 11? That's overly optimistic.

> There were, on average, 500 million tweets posted per day last year.

How many of them had photos and were reported as crime?

It starts with title "We need more than deplatforming" which means "deplatforming is good, but it's not enough".

noun: deplatforming; noun: de-platforming

    the action or practice of preventing someone holding views regarded as unacceptable or offensive from contributing to a forum or debate, especially by blocking them on a particular website.

It continues with "Changing these dangerous dynamics requires more than just the temporary silencing or permanent removal of bad actors from social media platforms."

Blocking, silencing and removal does suppress speech.

I doubt that many young people do "high protein / low carb" diet. It's hard to avoid carbs by mistake, especially with young people food like fries, pizza and beer.

"Low carb" diet does not lower your testosterone. "High protein" diet does [1], because proteins will bond with testosterone. Increased magnesium will prevent that [2].

"High fat / low carb" diet will increase your testosterone due to increased dietary fat consumption.

[1]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2129168/ [2]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958794/

Only after divorce.

> #KillAllWhatever should be banned as well in my book, I'm not defending it.

Thank you.

> It is, in the context of the events from the past few weeks

If something is "very precise" in context, then it is not precise. If we have to interpret words, then we have multiple interpretations and everybody can have their own truth. You can't say something is "a very precise call to violence" because of some people may interpret it their way.

His tweet (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/13469127807005777...) is very precise. "I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence!"

> Calling thousands of supporters to go to the capitol and telling them "you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong." is a very precise call to violence.

"Kill them", "Attack them", "Burn down that building" is a very precise call to violence. "You have to be strong" is not. "You have to show strength" is not.

#KillAllMen on the other hand is a very precise call to violence, and yet nobody cares about banning that on social media.

Thank you.

Can I ask what requires HBO therapy for five days a week for six months?

Stability of price is good for company, because:

a) middle managers can just do (price x amount of sold items)

b) if price goes down in time then some customers will wait indefinitely for better price

c) good publicity if your item is sold cheaper than competition

d) changing price can be seen as "our product is worth less than we expected"

> I was unable to find the paper the article claims was published about this, which is a shame because I'd love to learn more about what the researchers actually said.

https://www.aging-us.com/article/103571

Archived: http://archive.is/r4jS7

Left-side agenda.

Insurance is marketed as opposite of gambling, which is brilliant. Psychology says that people would rather not lose $10 than win $10 so reframing it as "protection from loss" is great move.

While we're at it, isn't the `git` word offensive? I mean, based on https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/git git means foolish or worthless person! It's not acceptable to call any person worthless! Please change this name.

> it would ‘tax’ house owners less than renters

It would tax house owners less than people who had same amount of money but didn't buy house and kept money in bank. If both house owner and renter had $1000 in bank, they would lose the same.

"If you don't like government ideas, why don't you move somewhere else?"

Moving out is the best opt-out ever. (until pandemic hits and you can't move out)

Increased loot rate usually increases farming.

Imaginary review: "Terrible cooking, too much salt. 2 stars (+1 star for being my wife)"

Does that mean Jeff Bezos is potentially the strongest hacker?