91 karma · joined November 12, 2012
In the UK you need to email BT (who operate the emergency system) and arrange a window to place a series of test calls to both 999 and 112. They will give you a time, a date and a script to exactly follow. If you pre-schedule with them it's supported.
Their email is 999testcalls@bt.com
Not sure if US have a system like it.
Although there is a 5$ fee.
The problem is that the amount of money you could flow through it would be very little before it starts raising red flags compared to other methods.
Would be ideal for a small time drug dealer who wants an easy way to get cash though.
[0] https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/finalised-guidance/fg16-5...
Except if the HTML/CSS is hosted on that CDN?
A few points from the top of my head:
* Large enterprises won't pay the costs listed publicly, they will each have their own contract written up with AWS.
* Contracts - it can take YEARS for new companies to be added to the approved vendors list.
* Frameworks will already be in place for how resources are managed and accessed securely.
* Enterprise support agreements will already be in place.
* Physical security that is regularly audited
Asking these people to wait two days before they can get their phone fixed or to sell it wouldn't be a nice user experience. Can you imagine the amount of pissed off people in the Apple store waiting to get their screen fixed only to be told to come back in 2 days?
1-2 hours would be the ideal candidate I think without being a inconvenience.
Another idea would be a 24-48 hour window to 'revoke' the disabling of the activation lock. Perhaps they can login to Apple ID website to reinstate activation lock remotely.
Most of those healthcare companies take the approach of "if it works don't touch it" or they where already bought into one of the existing large EPR's - which is why we ended up putting our product on the back-burner as the market wasn't there yet.
I recently observed a company move from 'everyone is the same title' to specific jnr, snr, distinguished engineer titles. The primary reasons for this was to create a framework for salaries and provide a defined track for 'progressing' as the organisation got bigger.
But if you think about it - it really comes down to a method of retaining staff and salary banding, I have yet to see any organisations where the titles of engineers defines their abilities, all engineers have the same say.
It's good to see they have got their focus right with version 2.