altermetax

That whole homepage sounds like Claude

Honestly, I think "source available" is used pretty consistently, and if someone said "weights available" I would immediately understand what they mean.

No one calls SQLite "source available", and if they do, they're doing it more as a protest of their development model than being serious.

No, because they can't register the domain, it's already taken, no matter if a web service is running behind it or not

I don't really see the difference, code is protected by copyright (or copyleft) as much as art is, and yet the LLM scrapers use it without scruples. Same goes for math and science publications.

Are there disadvantages in allowing users arbitrarily long passwords (or with a very high limit, e.g. 256 bytes)? No.

Are there advantages? Yes: the longer the password is, the stronger it is. It doesn't matter if there's a specific point after which cracking takes time till the death of the universe. So there's no point in imposing a limit.

Besides, too many websites limit password length to ridiculous lengths like 12.

Locking you out after a few wrong tries only protects against online attacks. If someone gets access to the database, they have as many attempts as they want.

It changed with smartphones being widespread, so more or less yes, 2012

It's not GNU itself that's appealing, it's the fact that it's not controlled by a company.

I mean, they are trying

Low-effort take: can't you just run ss -tulpn repeatedly and parse the output?

Just open a terminal split/tab and use claude there. The neovim buffer will update real-time.