amazingman

Did you know he's actually qualified for the role he had? Do you even know what a board of directors does?

>Bolsonaro's coup never actually took place, and even if it had, it'd only be a reaction to the concrete actions of the supreme court.

21st century fascism, distilled.

>People put meta cameras on their faces and go to the bathroom without take them out. Are they children?

None of your business. Nor Meta's.

>Are they poor souls without agency on their own?

None of your business. Nor Meta's.

>Are they retarded?

None of your business. Nor Meta's.

>By now everyone know what Meta does, if you choose to use their products and being spied on, it's on you.

Everyone on HN perhaps. If you think that of the general public, you vastly overestimate the average human.

That's a different topic.

Dogmas are bad and elicit the same wrongthink phenomenon you're railing against.

The implication was that website makers won't be forced to support Safari because they'll just decide to require Chrome.

This is what flagging is for.

Sounds a lot like using LLMs for coding ~18mo ago.

This is my first year paying attention F1 and I've noticed some major themes:

1. It's all very complex. 2. It's legitimately exciting to watch much of the time. 3. The favorite pastime of passionate F1 fans is complaining about F1.

How long ago did you try Zen? The recent releases have crossed the threshold for me. Specifically the syncing of all tabs across devices. I tried twice before in the past 12mo and bounced off both times. Currently I'm a few weeks in and I'm not switching back to Arc.

It continues to amaze me the lengths people will go to avoid the obvious.

Non sequitur

And how is it bad optics? Seems to me it would be a good look, where OpenAI would appear magnanimous and interested in fairness rather than craven and sociopathic. Which is how they look now, regardless of your attempts to distract from this.

That is pure fantasy.

And what of the personal threats?

We don't need every country to pace the frontier, just a certain few. And yes, I believe it's possible and the prior art is nuclear non-proliferation. Non-proliferation wasn't perfect, of course, but it was good enough (so far) to pull back from the brink of extinction.

This smacks of "all information should be free" dogma. I for one prefer not to be ground into dust in service of producing more paperclips.

And we all know how good OpenAI is at containing models during training...

Prove it. Your systems hack and/or abuse other systems and you can't seem to even observe it happening much less do anything about it. Why should we believe your claims when they depend on an ability you don't actually have?

Sure. These are the other sides of the coin. I've been medicated for years and unmedicated for years. Currently I'm in a ~10yr unmedicated stretch. Do I have frustrating moments, embarrassing easily avoidable failures, and so on? Yes. Do I sometimes lose many hours to a task and forget to eat? Yes. But I'm also kinder, more playful, and more present with my loved ones when I am unmedicated.

If the downsides get too bad and things start to fall apart then I will medicate again. Until then, no way I'm making that tradeoff.

I have found both hyperfocus and the ability to quickly "drop" (i.e. distract from) a train of thought incredibly useful.

Indeed some people think they want a machine guessing at your intentions and acting upon that guess. Those people Are wrong in at least 2 directions: that it is what they want, and their implicit assumption that it could possibly be safe.

The same day I finally migrated from Arc to Zen. What a coincidence ^^

Can you quantify the scale of it or not?

The threat is not technical but systemic. It's about supply chain dependencies and further empowering a cutout of the Chinese military apparatus.

Poe's Law aside: This is why government exists and must exist.

Insurance against loss due to ... paying for insurance? The language of the thing is compelling at first glance, but it doesn't actually parse. Sharing your gambling wins with patrons to attract more patrons is not insurance.

I'm pretty sure essentially all HN participants understand that the frontier labs indiscriminately sucked up every bit of human output they could, IP and ethical concerns be damned. Some of that cohort may indeed be okay with it, but that doesn't change the facts.

This smells a bit like a statement of faith. Digital neurons and neural networks are not the same as their biological counterparts, sure. But it is not an unreasonable proposition that their functions are isomorphic.

They also have made a big deal about how what they did to build their models is not stealing. And we all know that's bullshit.