210 karma · joined November 8, 2016
> What if you have to use the data in some complex join-heavy query? Make a copy of the data needed in the relational database and hope that the data doesn't get unsynchronised?
No, he's saying that schema-less, arbitrarily-extended information has no business in a relational system at all.
Congratulations for you that cooking is simple and easy. It isn't for everybody.
Not at all. It turns out one of the standards was not relevant to the target population. As you quoted: "This is because in early cases of Alzheimer’s, patients may have the biological indicators of the disease without actually showing symptoms."
There's no point in trying to alleviate symptoms where there are no symptoms. If I develop a drug that removes tumors that eventually caused headaches, is it somehow lowering standards if it removes tumors before a headache appears?
> My answer to him was, "John, when people thought the earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the earth was spherical, they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." -- Isaac Asimov
If that were true, you would believe anything and everything you read. I doubt that, barring Trump tweets, I will read a more ignorant statement all week.
Alec Guinness, James Earl Jones, Peter Cushing, Harrison Ford--none of these are slackers. Anthony Daniels might not have much range, but he fit perfectly in the scope required of him. Mark Hamill was convincing as Luke.
The only weak link to me, bless her soul, might have been Carrie Fisher. And maybe a few bit-players. But the bulk of the show was carried by capable, if not excellent, actors.
Not everyone has gotten through every day just fine, though. Drowsiness increases the chance of automobile accidents, decreases working memory, and, over time, contributes to stress-related diseases.
E.g.:
Q1: I'm trying to do x and it isn't working. A1: You're missing a comma in the list on line 7.
Q2: I'm trying to do x (and I've checked all of my commas), and it isn't working. A2: Closed as duplicate of Q1.
I had similar problems when my hair was long, but I really don't think it's comparable to what black people face. Being white, my problems went away when I cut my hair, nighttime walks or no. And black people get harassed day and night, so I think anti-nocturnalism is a small, small part of the problem, not the root.
The article implies that it did. Even if it didn't, saying that it's okay is like saying it's okay to drive recklessly, as long as you don't hit anyone; it's not.
> And was that resource so needed in the first place
Ask that to someone who uses it. Mental health is a real problem for some students, but I guess some people don't care about that.
> And that's what I called by not giving chances and Old Testament mentality.
I don't know what "Old Testament" has anything to do with it. She flaunted the fact that she wouldn't face consequences (or so she be believed), so it looks like consequences are how she thinks, too.
> Perhaps some people enjoy their society being the #1 in incarcerations in the world...
This entire paragraph is blowing smoke.
> What happened to a scolding, and a promise to not do that kind of thing again?
That kind of thing is for children. This woman is an adult, and should already know what adult behavior is like. And if you're so concerned about unemployment, realize that there is someone else out there looking for a teaching job, who knows how to act like a grown-up, who will happily fill the opening.
She fake-doxxed another school's crisis hotline, made that resource unavailable to students who needed it; she embarrassed her school and forced the administration to issue a statement when they had better things to do.
> Or that they don't deserve second and third chances.
If she's fired, she has as many chances as she wants to apply to a school that wants to risk having to clean up after her irresponsible bullshit.
Is there any research into this meaning of learning styles, as opposed to tied to sensory modes?
The only other options are (a) knowing after it's too late to do anything, or (b) knowing at the exact moment science makes a discovery. Since we can't know (b) ahead of time, we're left with either knowing ahead of time, or too late.
Knowing sucks, but it sucks less than any other option.