73 karma · joined January 26, 2020
So the concern here is that it may be as hard (or very similar) to start something small vs trying for something big .. I will note that going for something big also likely means starting small (so again same effort)
Did you steer away from GA for the same reasons?
- Both libraries are not quite stand-alone a true stand-alone would be API-based (maybe include SDKs). My search comes up empty.
- How'd you determine the $10 USD / month number?
- I'm either not able to search well enough to find a tool - It's just not valuable enough for anyone to create - Schelp blindness
Definitely valueable but I feel it's not been cracked quite yet.
but if gets out of control (as one company had 47 people sharing one account), that's plain rip-off and costs companies a lot of money. So it's a good idea to limit the number of devices. Many companies do that, for example Evernote limits how many devices you can use to access your own notes.
On top of that, you pay for 24 access to a device but companies would totally change the structure if they knew everyone would be streaming 24/7 it's a stats and chance game.
Also, not saying everyone has good intetions nor is everyone a bad actor. Manytimes it's just easier to share than add a paid user. Other comapnies allow you to share account for a discounted price. It's not a black and white situation :), but for anyone who wants to control or just monitor that, this library helps them.
[Full disclosure, I'm the founder of https://sabil.io, which offers SaaS companies easy and accurate account-sharing detection and control]
Regarding the product solving a real pain, I agree. Aesthetics are overlooked if the need is there.
On the other hand, wouldn't you want to optimize this part of your funnel? Maybe even see if there's a problem between signups and conversions? You'd want your users to get value from your product as soon as possible, and a good onboarding truly helps (see courier.com, for example).
I'm pretty surprised that your aversion to another dependency outweighs the possible benefits of having a good onboarding flow.
BTW, I was actually thinking of redirecting users after signup to a beautifully designed (customizable) onboarding flow that includes an A/B test as part of it so that product managers can play with it as much as they want without devoting engineering resources.
Thoughts?
That's one of the reasons entering this market is challenging. 1. So many existing solutions are bad, so people will assume you're also bad. 2. You will be lost in all voices and blogs and ads for these bad products.
But for the point about making it too easy hurts PMF, I think it's not going to have that much of an impact and it's never a bad thing to have your product perform well.
I'm more worried about companies opting to build their own flow because it matches their brand and design. Any thoughts about this?
What do you mean when you say "user group events"? is this like in-person meetups or is it something else?