2,080 karma · joined July 22, 2010
In this variant of the Monty Hall problem, since all the doors are transparent, you can clearly see what is behind each door. This changes the nature of the problem entirely. The element of uncertainty, which is present in the original Monty Hall problem, is no longer a factor.
In this scenario, if you pick door No. 1 and see a car behind it, you should stick with your choice, as there is no advantage to switching. If you pick door No. 1 and see a goat behind it, you should switch to door No. 2, as you can clearly see the car behind it.
Since you can see what's behind the doors, the probability of winning the car is no longer based on conditional probability, and the original Monty Hall paradox does not apply. Instead, your decision is simply based on your observation of what's behind each door.
(I have not had reason to use it yet, unfortunately)
<<According to Title 3 of the US Code, the US President "shall earn" a salary of $400,000, along with a $50,000 annual expense account, a $100,000 nontaxable travel account, and $19,000 for entertainment.>>
Where can a mediocre software developer get $450K+?!
Although AMD’s response in the forum was that these were isolated issues, phoronix was able to
reproduce crashes by running a stress test that consists of compiling a number of open source
programs. They report they were able to get 53 segfaults with one hour of attempted compilation.[1]: https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset...
Either I misunderstand you, or this is _remarkably_ wrong: Protocol buffers were designed to make it easy to define protocols which are both backward and forward compatible.
- 10 GHz
- long pipelines, I think we're currently at around 14 stages, which is more than P6 but less than Netburst (Pentium 4)
- EUV lithography is still not a thing at 10 nm
Die I miss any important failed predictions?