1,331 karma · joined May 4, 2012
Eno worked on a number of projects to generate music years ago, with Bloom and similar: http://www.generativemusic.com/. A quick fiddle with that can definitely generate some banal hold/elevator music.
Sure, the algorithms, once sufficiently advanced, could probably trick us into thinking that certain examples of generative music were made by a person and then later reveal its algorithmic origin to prove that "the humans are stupid" and "the google algorithms are clever" but what are we actually proving here?
Can a computer devise new artistic forms that have some genuine impact on people - can a computer come up with Bacon's Triptych of George Dyer outside of regurgitating fragments of what it already has seen? What do we get out of a computer aping the alcohol-fuelled sweaty anarchic performances of The Black Lips?
The interesting stuff will be to see if this goes to other places that music has not yet gone - some new composition method - manipulation of frequency in ways that humans have not yet devised.
However there are no references to him on his "discoveries". Note the lack of a history section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teichm%C3%BCller_space and compare that to the section on Hilbert space: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_space#History
On the other hand, Felix Hausdorff, who also appears to have worked in the same field (though topology is probably a far broader field than I can understand) has plenty of information readily available. This is conjecture, but the mere lack of solid information on Teichmueller could lend credence to some of what you say.
There is a book about mathematics under the Nazis, which would likely cover a lot of ground http://www.jstor.org/stable/20453494?seq=1#page_scan_tab_con...
Anyway, bit of a mystery ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
* Thousands of free decks
* An open ecosystem
* Source code
* Doesn't spam your email
* Isn't just a straightforward monetisation of anki's general premise
I could see some value being produced from this, but it just isn't there right now.
Any middle ground between "highly valuable" and "disaster"?
I don't really think svs meant any offence, especially having now seen the original poem. I also don't think we can live in a society where everybody has perfectly-formed liberal views. At the same time, I'm not down with this "why are people so easily offended"/"turn down your offence-o-meter" argument that one hears when this comes up, mainly because it is a trivially easy card to play when you aren't the target of the stereotyping
Why not put a CV/homepage link in your profile?
Facebook doesn't need any apologists, least of all from the HN community. Whether the article is linkbait or not, Facebook does need constant critique. Om Malik points out that Facebook Home means a new kind of persistent data-gathering wrapped in a trendy (?) skin that most facebook users will want to try out. It is bad enough that a billion people blithely use their web and phone apps without them having something that sinks its hooks in deeper
Additionally, it is disabled by policykit in releases past 12.04: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/policykit-desktop-...
So yeah, Hibernate is broken in Ubuntu in 2013, and your downvote doesn't change that
In the name of humanity, wouldn't it be nice if people were in the habit of shutting their computers down, rather than letting them burn through electricity all night long?
1) Read opening text 2) See container (presumably a video) with no explanation. I cannot load the video. 3) Read next paragraph to see what the video was about. No explanation. Close tab.
What I pictured in my head was some kind of nightmare scenario where bands like The Horrors* learn to code and start writing songs about what a drag it is to learn about databases and managing your own memory. I guess seeing that guy from the black eyed peas in that code.org video has affected me somehow. Time to get some sleep.
* http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/2929851/The+Horrors+By+T...
Atwood had an idea that SE would be "like Wikipedia" for QA, and Stack Overflow has certainly had success in that regard. I think that contributors to the site get very much the same value proposition as that of Wikipedia, if not slightly more in the user profile/karma regard.
Of course, none of this negates your point about the influence of funding!
http://www.isthe.com/chongo/tech/math/digit/m57885161/prime-...