How does computer use APIs affect this? Isn't the whole idea that a UI that a human can use should also be usable by an agent without a lot of special accommodation made? For high volume automation and API is a lot more efficient, but for lots of typical automation (automating what would take a human 20-30 minutes of work to do themselves) this doesn't matter too much.
If you are elected on a platform of a coup (illegal reform), it doesn't make what you do any more legal. Some of what Trump is doing is not illegal, but some of it appears to be illegal.
My original understanding of "woke" was similar to what in the 60s they might have called being "turned on". Being awake and seeing the actual reality of things for what they are.
Also, it's pretty easy at this point to setup an AI support agent that can reference your docs, and it is a helpful exercise for organizing your own thoughts and being able to communicate them back to yourself. There's not really a good reason to not have good docs.
I just assume that if a product is gated behind "let's hope on a call!" it's still vaporware and there's a 50/50 chance that they'll pivot within a few months.
It seems that maybe the direction things are heading in is having desktop apps that can take over the computer, and prompt you to sign in yourself when auth is needed. Which would limit the usefulness of something like MCP as the interface becomes the UI, not APIs. But I'd be curious what other approaches to auth seem to be promising.
When I go to Jotai npm docs page (https://www.npmjs.com/package/jotai) I don't really get the impression of how this helps get away from using a lot of different context providers or Redux. The nice thing about context hooks is they are composable, combined with cached queries you can have a decently maintainable pattern. How does Jotai provide a tangible improvement on this?
The one time in my life I had a life-threatening illness, multiple doctors told me I had nothing to worry about it and the symptoms would go away on their own before I was able to meet with a doctor who took my concerns seriously, and an MRI then found the issue. That experience has really stuck with me and I suspect it is very common.
It's possible we see some ways in which AI becomes increasingly AGI like in some ways but not in others. For example, AI that can create novel scientific discoveries but can't make a song as good as your favorite musician who creates a strong emotional effect with their music.
Natural selection results in species succeeding that do some pretty brutal things. Natural selection also applies to religions, governments, and startups.
It has also become quite easy when sanding a UI to provide code to an LLM and describe something like a click deadzone and it can usually fix it immediately without you needing to investigate it. The missing piece is really just the glue between the browser, coding environment and LLM. I know a bunch of YC startups are working on this but nothing has really worked well for me. Please recommend anything you are using that does in fact provide this type of glue...
By the way, there is an excellent film called Rebel Ridge now on Netflix where the basic premise is about small town police abusing the practice of civil asset forfeiture.
Setting aside the addressing of anxiety and avoidance, a lot of good code review practice boils down to "could/should/must" and that it's good to call out these when you see them and label them appropriately, and when receiving a code review understand the difference between them.
> Buying GPUs now when they're highly-available is a hedged-bet against a worse GPU shortage than ever seen before in the face of unprecedented territorial aggression.
This actually makes it occur to me that if you've been hoarding a huge amount of GPUs, it may actually be in your interest to then encourage the events that would lead to a subsequent GPU shortage.
Isn't the only reason the Supreme Court would not sustain a law is because it is unconstitutional? And otherwise their only role is to interpret laws? At least that's the way it is supposed to be AFAIK.
A not very degen version of this is taking money that you might spend on your mortgage at a rate under 3%, and putting it somewhere safe that earns more than 5% (not hard to find).
Not just humans, but Uber/Lyft drivers. It is very common for an Uber driver to perform unsafe and illegal maneuvers while driving me. I don't report them because I don't want to get them fired. Usually I don't even remark on it, unless I think they did it in a way that was especially unsafe.
An alternative is to do the first couple minutes of your talk at 2x speed and then suddenly slow down to a normal pace when you reach the interesting part. That should get their attention.
This reminds me of how in the WWDC keynote, the example used for the new hidden apps feature was an app involving hair styles. Yup, I'm sure that is exactly the kind of app people would want to be hiding on their phone...
I think what you mean is OP is going to answer their own question with something selling resources to help others "make $10k/month with AI apps"? Whether or not that's the intention this type of question does attract the snake oil sales pitches.
I think it's likely that what is happening is the process of mindfulness (noticing your anxiety without judgement, and allowing it to exist and gently float away) is no match for that daily onslaught of culture, largely propagated via social media, that what we must do is focus and obsess on what makes us anxious. And if you don't focus on what makes you anxious, you are a fool at best and an enemy combatant at worst.