518 karma · joined October 20, 2019
1. Parents have to care
2. Parents need to know how to support education at home
Both of those are sorely lacking in said districts.
No local politician likes that because it means pointing the finger of blame at the electorate (being the parents).
I don’t know what the answer is.
I hadn’t heard anything like this. Can you provide details?
We used the jokers and the two of spades as trumps, but not the two of diamonds. We pulled out the two of hearts and the two of diamonds.
> She's gone now, too, like all of the real elders in my family.
If we're lucky, someday we'll become the real elders of our families.
That being said, it’s only acceptable IMO when:
1. It’s only on school-issued equipment.
2. It’s only during hours when the school is responsible for the pupil.
3. What’s being monitored and recorded is stated explicitly in and limited to a document that is distributed to students and parents when the equipment is issued.
4. When screen grabbers or Remote Desktop are used, the student is given some kind of obvious on-screen warning that they are being surveiled in real time.