660 karma · joined June 20, 2019
I only have my experience - it made me extremely stressed for over a decade. It felt like anything I wanted to be or do was probably wrong in some way that I could never predict, as often things I thought would be perfectly fine turned out to be wrong, often for reasons that I really couldn't understand why or base general rules on. I was basically scared around the clock that somebody catches me behaving in wrong way, and I was always prepared to stop everything and start masking - looking like and doing things my peers expect me to. I went from talkative happy kid to extremely quiet person who probably always looked like I'm ready to soil my pants. I spoke really little for a ~decade, feeling like every time I'd open my mouth I'll say something wrong and it can be used against me. Later on I stayed the nights awake quiet in a dark room and slept when other people were home and awake, because then I could maximize the time being just myself without worrying about who I was expected to be. I pretty much still don't have a good relationship with my parents, they've never known who I am as I just learnt to hide myself. I think they're good parents, they just didn't know what to do with different kind of kid and made some terrible choices in a conservative time and place where having a "non-normal" kid was not acceptable outcome. And I wasn't really good at communicating what I was feeling or the kind of damage it was doing to me.
I know I took it in a really hard way, I knew even then. As autistic person I can have quite intense feelings. Like I said I'm sure there's autistic people who have the opposite opinion and experience. But I know I'm wasn't some special case, I'm quite sure there's a lot of trauma associated with a lot of ABA'd children. I can definitely understand the parent's viewpoint and also that there's wide spectrum of completely different cases, but I really don't think this should be ABA-parents vs autistic kids disagreement, we both would have a better life if we'd have some better therapies for autistic people - I just think the best starting point would be understanding what causes the stress/anxiety/discomfort/meltdowns and trying to fix the underlying issues, not from trying to hide the symptoms like we're praying gay away. The goal should be a child with as good, healthy life as possible, not some expected behavior. Maybe ABA style therapy is good for some and I expressed myself in kinda extreme way - there's some history behind that, that I really haven't fully processed in a healthy way yet - but parents should understand when it's used in the wrong way or wrong cases it can go really bad, it's not something that should be just done because good options are lacking.
I haven't gone through official ABA therapy but I had extremely ABA-like childhood and I'd have to agree. When I was kid and didn't know what's different about me I used to think at least there's probably millions like me who don't have to go through that. When I found out about my autism and later ABA, I was horrified to know it's official therapy. But I'm sure there's autistic people who'd disagree with me.
GGPoker is currently the biggest online poker network. In January, someone wrote an article in CardPlayer Lifestyle[0] about how their client is quite badly programmed (with Adobe Air) and sends data as clear text with real name information that shouldn't be shared with everyone. It seems GGPoker didn't really take it that seriously, but at least enabled SSL for their connections.
Lately a bunch of players noticed player named "MoneyTaker69" was playing with extremely loose strategy (which usually would be losing big time), but winning at insane 90 big blinds / 100 hands rate (good players might win from few to maybe 10+ big blinds per 100 hands on average). Lots of hands played were really suspect, and definitely anyone playing hands like that should never be getting so lucky that they'd win during thousands of hands. Also the most winning leaderboard is full of people who won at really, really good rate for ~15 000 hands, and then just disappeared - which would be strange to do for any gambler or even a profitable poker player in a great winning streak.
So this leads to this statement by GGPoker. I linked the archive link as currently the real url is leading me to another page, so it might be removed. GGPoker has a feature that when players are all in, their winning probability gets shown, and apparently also some thumbs up / down button that depends on the odds. It seems like player(s) were running a modified client that could request that information at any time in the hand, even when the hands are not shown yet or the players all in. GGPoker also said they returned $29 000, while "MoneyTaker69" won $48 000 in a single tournament, even without counting any of their cash came winnings.
It isn't the first time this has happened - in 2007 Absolute Poker and UltimateBet were found to have "superusers" that knew cards of the other players[1], that time they were insiders in the companies. They were found out in the same way - crazy hands and massive winrates that didn't make any sense, and an absolutely wild call in a tournament that the superuser "POTRIPPER" went on to win.
I thought this might be interesting for HN - mostly for how the biggest Poker Network has handled their security.
[0] https://cardplayerlifestyle.com/ggnetwork-acknowledges-fixes... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cereus_Poker_Network#2005%E2%8...
Would it be hard to set up a build server on another machine? What if that other machine was running Arch or some other system?
I remember when running Gentoo ~20 years ago, it was quite often that package compilation failed and I had to go fix some package settings or something, don't even remember well except how disappointing it was seeing a failed compilation again after waiting a long time - is this still common occurrence?
edit: at least the build server doesn't look too bad and the running other arch could be solved with a WM / container.. Feeling really like wanting to give it a try, still remember the good times I had with Gentoo way back (even with the compilation problems)
The default git configuration was kinda weird, but I think I initialized the git myself and then added it in Logseq before adding the hooks and it's been good experience.
- Dark energy would make it less compute-intensive towards the end of the simulation. If you knew where your observers are you could simulate less and less over time, while also reaching an ethical endpoint for the simulation
- and with Double-slit experiment, we kinda know that universe knows when things are observed
- Cosmic Microwave Background would hide a lot of signals further away, giving a possibility of aggregating or dropping signals further away from observers
- Diffraction Limit would limit the resolution of observations we can make from further away, limiting the resolution of the needed simulation.
- Quantum uncertainty principle would be easy way to make the simulation non-deterministic by just adding some jitter / variance.
I might have written some things that are wrong. Also it doesn't really answer your questions as this doesn't really lead me to believe we surely live in a simulation, it's just something I like to think about sometimes.
It's not like this is only related to Covid. You can see people "doing their own research" on climate change as well, without knowing the basics of science, physics, systems science or actual climate science, but they've watched a podcast or read a blog. Covid just made this bro science stuff so mainstream that it's hard to have a beer in a bar without hearing about it.
I just checked my manual tags in the training database and I've been on this for 197 hours and 37 minutes since since 12th of October. No wonder I feel like I need a break..
Started as a small project on wanting to learn C# better and being interested about how much sensors collect information about us and how we could analyze that, but it really got out of hand. I've been working on it for a ~month (with some breaks), sometimes all day, built a lot of tooling (like webassembly & android app to tag current activities for ML training data) and analysis things for it and am nearing a burnout point :P but been fun and I've definitely learned a lot about C# and ML.
I was little lost there for a moment, I didn't add a project but went straight into settings, which brought up an empty page (with navigation though) with apparently nowhere to go. Only after logging in again and adding a project made it work, so it was little confusing and maybe it should steer you to right direction if you end up on that empty settings page.
edit: On second thought I don't think the tsunami one might make that much sense, probably was just a collection of videos and news captures.
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5tbah19qo8 [1] https://apolloinrealtime.org/13/
Now I have my own kid and I'm finding it hard to put limits on phone usage as her peers are on tiktok etc. all the time. But the most important thing I'm trying to do is have these discussions and then that's it, try to act on what we've agreed, but not arbitrarily whine about too much usage or anything else that would make her constantly stress about it. And try to guide her to spend the screen time in better ways, like spending time playing Factorio / Minecraft multiplayer with her so we get creative time together instead of her looking short videos.
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/151692/exceptionall...