1,078 karma · joined March 25, 2011
what about one with a falsified result?
fwiw I think convexity and understanding are relatively orthogonal, but how could one employ the former without the latter? However the author's position seems to be more that gaming systems works better than exploring their contexts. Sometimes you might make more money in less time, but the money is all you'll get out of it. In practice, maybe understanding and convex payoff functions are both useful at different scales.
https://azizonomics.com/2012/01/04/a-history-of-reserve-curr...
Brouwer's career suffered as a consequence of his disagreements with Hilbert.
EDIT (with links to the political aspect): Letters written more about the politics of publishing than the math itself are referenced in a book called "The War of the Frogs and the Mice" (PDF) http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.224... (see bottom of pg 9 as displayed for the letter Brouwer wrote to Hilbert's wife)
Also, good is subjective, and we don't have wetware in our engineering toolchain anyway. Loosely coupled metaphors seem to be popular and effective due to ambiguities like this.
meditate
over time, the worst part of working from home is lack of eye contact. engaging with others outside of home can help, but there's still an awkward quality to getting to know people without seeing their reactions
(+ here's a link to Dreyfus' essay Why Heideggerian AI failed http://cid.nada.kth.se/en/HeideggerianAI.pdf)
in all seriousness though, I heard someone talk about their qc research a year or so ago and it was fascinating but I imagine debugging such systems could be quite the challenge
Logic & Design also has a wonderful chapter on rhythm in visual design
http://www.amazon.com/Logic-Design-Revised-Science-Mathemati...
Awesome project though!