76 karma · joined February 2, 2019
As shown, date complications are very tough to calculate and there are many levels of features.
However, the phases of the moon complication is not discussed in much depth here. Is it a simple calculation independent of the date?
For instance, if I highlight in Chapter 8 "In 539" [next paragraph] "Belisarius" [next paragraph] "marched on Ravenna" [10 paragraphs later] "In 540 Belisarius entered Ravenna".
I would like to export this with the Chapter header and detailed highlight locations OR just as one sentence with subtle links to the locations.
Yes, there might be collisions in a DNA hash-code (such as identical twins), but there can be protocols for that.
Once caveat was that the IBM older pension plan was more valuable than a 401k plan because IBM investment strategy was far better than the average 401k investor options.
"Conversions did not generally work in their favor" for these reasons: 1) IBM originally announced (around 1999) that all active employees were converted to the less desirable 401k plan. After a lawsuit, IBM had a formula for who got the more valuable older pension. Two people have 18 years of service for IBM. The younger one (say 45 years old) had no choice but to switch. The older one (say 50 years) was allowed a choice.
2) IBM was able to control the amount for the 401k payout. Their pension value (easily calculated future value based on salary and years of service) was converted into present value based on IBM's estimation of the amount you could make in free market investments. So essentially they said "Your $2M pension is worth $36k today because we calculated you can make 20% per year in investing. Here's your $36k for 18 years of service." (By the way, IBM salaries were usually lower than most other companies because they always touted their great pension plan that no others could match.)
Both these points were argued in courts. The first point was won by some employees, not all, only IBM knows. The second point was won by IBM.
However this paper of all the interactions is at a higher level. I could just barely relate it to what I know. As an engineer I appreciate the presentation of the data and the amount of thought that went into it. I will have to study the paper more.
Consider the Beat Buddy pedal (automated drum accompaniment pedal) which can play lots of digital content via user commands. Yes the foot commands are limited ("add a fill", "splash sound", "next phrase", "end song"), and so are the dials ("choose playlist", "change tempo"). However, the proper stomping really helps if you want to add an extra solo or just chill with a beat while you tell a story.
Why did Jake ask "Can I have another biscuit?"?
I was frightened when Jake shouted "Who are you?"!
My trousers were soiled when Jake shouted "Boo!"!
Why did I soil my trousers when Jake shouted "Boo!"?
In a slight adjustment of this example, what if the text were a question and the quotation were a statement. Would this be a good construct: Why did Jake believe "the AI was going to kill us all."?
Similarly you could have a text statement with a quoted question: Jake asked "would the AI kill us all?".
You can load common name sets (e.g. X11 color names, CSS names, Munsell names, Behr) and they map their values into your color pickers.
This works well especially with paint pigments as every manufacturer has their exotic names that they hype for that year. "Oh, 'Ice Blue' is really just a slightly blueish white."
I did not agree with him all the time, but he profoundly changed my views on endless debates at the time such as the effect of weight on the tradeoff of durability versus speed.
Help me out on the legality of some of these boards. I see excess pieces on many boards (for example, 2 or more queens, 4 or more knights of one color).
Are these considered legal by pawn conversion?
I see the domain is now available.