652 karma · joined April 3, 2026
However, for some strange reason, the West refuses to use dialectic materialism to explain when times are bad, when males feel lonely or face increased suicide rates.
material conditions explain everything, both when times are good, and when times are bad.
The solution is to obtain (via any means necessary) better material conditions, which might include redistribution by force or political action
if you are not reckless driver yourself, I dont see a downside here. You get lower premiums, insurance is able to narrow down the pool of reckless drivers and properly price them and modify their behavior via monetary incentives
whats the actual downside here??????
in the US auto OEMs are mainly putting parts together, made by different suppliers like ZF, Bosch, Lemforder etc etc. Its assembly work and it split across hundreds of legacy car component suppliers
the real argument is efficiency, US cannot match efficiency and scale. Thats the root cause.
Whats the real argument for a Brazilian, why they should be concerned with this ludicrous claims from USA: "muh China is tracking you going to Copacabana beach. Stop buying Chinese EV for $20k, buy Tesla for $60k instead and you will be safe!!!!11"
PISA result distributions are completely different
For example Gregory Mankiw's Economics textbook is 800 pages.
Russian economics textbook by Tarasevich is 374 pages
There wont be any impact on students, because every year every class is reshuffled slightly, and every 3-4 years you change school altogether
The school is supposed to be a safe learning environment, not a simple daycare.
learning means giving a feedback to improve. If you destroy the feedback mechanism that gives negative news, then people stop learning altogether.
Imagine trying to train a neural network, but you dont have backpropagation, because negative feedback is bad. So you stick to throwing noodles at the wall and hope something will stick
That's it, there is no other explanation.
Stalin took the reigns of a devastated, poor, agricultural society and left it as a nuclear armed superpower who won WW2. The State had the goal of being a strong state and educating its people to be strong people
Its impossible to do so at the lower end, without massive redistribution.
So the next possible action is to paper over the giant hole in the wall with plaster and pain and pretend that "everything is ok, according to standards"
Simple cybersecurity (offensive or defensive) qualifies for NIW, as well as other fields
Remember when the US had a hurricane somewhere in the South (Kathrina?), people just went looting all retail stores, same as what happened during BLM riots, the current riots in Paris, etc etc
if any hardware does not confirm to specs, thats on them and its actually a reason to pull out and replace legacy hw
rewrite can be done to quickly refactor and/or close the feature parity, improve the UI/UX for end customer, add missing features or integration needs
thats the only argument these people make
dont you see the problem with USA solving the problem and USA still having a lack of energy storage issue ???
AI already can do in-silico simulation
add microscopes and tiny precision actuators, and we can build closed feedback loop in-vitro system
once we have in-vitro, it will be easier to go in-vivo